AJ Gubash favors limited Flock use with local control
Republican candidate for Minnesota House District 53A
“which is why I don’t wholly oppose their use.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Minnesota House District 53A candidate questionnaire on Flock camerasTransparency question and candidate answers
Source and context
Interview
Minnesota House District 53A candidate questionnaire on Flock cameras (opens in a new tab)Transparency question and candidate answers
About this source
Candidate questionnaire prints direct answers from Mary Frances Clardy and AJ Gubash about continued Flock camera use in Minnesota.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The candidate questionnaire asked whether Flock cameras should continue to be used in Minnesota.
After the quotation
Gubash proposed deleting data unrelated to investigations after about 30 days and requiring permission or legal process for outside agencies to access local records.
How this statement is classified
Mixed or conditional
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
He supports continued use only with substantial restrictions.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement