Lily Tang Williams opposes Flock cameras

Lily Tang WilliamsRepublican nominee for U.S. House in New Hampshire's 2nd District

Condemned

Lily Tang Williams explicitly opposed Flock cameras and presented them as a threat to privacy and Fourth Amendment rights. She did not specify a legislative remedy in this post.

“I oppose Flock cameras”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Lily Tang Williams opposes Flock cameras in X post

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Lily Tang Williams in this case

Every statement by Lily Tang Williams
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original post

Lily Tang Williams opposes Flock cameras in X post (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Original post by Lily Tang Williams stating her opposition to Flock cameras.

Before the quotation

Williams wrote about Flock cameras in a broader post about technologies she considers threats to civil liberties.

After the quotation

She grouped the cameras with car kill switches, digital IDs, and central bank digital currency, but did not describe a proposed law or distinguish Flock's network from other license-plate readers.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Her statement expressly opposes the cameras at issue in the case.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Lily Tang Williams, Lily Tang Williams opposes Flock camerasDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Lily Tang Williams opposes Flock cameras
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3052-lily-tang-williams-explicitly-opposed-flock-cameras-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Lily Tang Williams opposes Flock cameras". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3052-lily-tang-williams-explicitly-opposed-flock-cameras-and