Sabrina Cervantes seeks safeguards, not an ALPR ban

California state senator and sponsor of SB 1013

“protecting the privacy of all Californians, immigrants, and our most vulnerable communities while ensuring law enforcement tools are used responsibly.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Cervantes' Bill Safeguarding Privacy and Placing Guardrails on Automated License Plate Recognition Clears Assembly Appropriations

Source and context

Official statement

Cervantes' Bill Safeguarding Privacy and Placing Guardrails on Automated License Plate Recognition Clears Assembly Appropriations (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Senator Cervantes' office quotes her position on ALPR safeguards and describes the proposed retention limit.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Her office announced progress for SB 1013, which would limit data retention and require stronger safeguards for ALPR operators and users.

After the quotation

Cervantes said unchecked ALPR-data use raised civil-liberties concerns. The bill would retain the technology under new limits.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Cervantes objects to unchecked network use but proposes a framework that would allow regulated ALPR systems to continue.

Recorded on
Published here
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement