Rob Sand favors waiting over an immediate Flock ban

Rob SandIowa state auditor and Democratic gubernatorial nominee

Mixed or conditional

Sand said privacy concerns about Flock are reasonable but opposed drastic immediate action. He said the company was losing contracts and would consider signing state safeguards if concerns persisted.

“That doesn't mean that we need drastic, immediate action.”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Both candidates for governor would sign Iowa regs for automated license plate readers

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Interview

Both candidates for governor would sign Iowa regs for automated license plate readers (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Radio Iowa quotes Rob Sand and Zach Lahn directly about Flock cameras and possible state rules.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Radio Iowa asked both major-party gubernatorial nominees about automated license-plate readers. Sand said the company had not put adequate checks and balances in place.

After the quotation

He said the market was working as Flock lost contracts and that he would consider signing safeguards later if concerns remained.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Sand criticizes Flock's safeguards but says continued use is acceptable for now and leaves future regulation conditional on remaining concerns.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Rob Sand, Rob Sand favors waiting over an immediate Flock banDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Rob Sand favors waiting over an immediate Flock ban
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3047-sand-said-privacy-concerns-about-flock-are-reasonable

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Rob Sand favors waiting over an immediate Flock ban". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3047-sand-said-privacy-concerns-about-flock-are-reasonable