Aaron Ford opposes Flock use until safeguards exist
Nevada attorney general and gubernatorial candidate
“Until Nevadans have these protections, I do not support the use of Flock cameras.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Aaron Ford statement on Flock camerasOpening paragraph of statement
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Nevada governor candidates state Flock positionsA Flock of bipartisan fury
Source and context
Official statement
Aaron Ford statement on Flock cameras (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraph of statement
About this source
Ford opposes Flock use until Nevada adopts privacy protections and promises to pursue guardrails.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Interview
Nevada governor candidates state Flock positions (opens in a new tab)A Flock of bipartisan fury
About this source
The Nevada Independent reports statements from Ford and Lombardo on whether to use ALPRs and what safeguards they favor.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Ford responded to the expansion of Flock cameras in Nevada.
After the quotation
He proposed legislation for guardrails rather than a permanent ban.
How this statement is classified
Mixed or conditional
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
His opposition is conditional on the absence of privacy protections.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement