Patel opposes Flock renewal without better regulation

Darshini PatelSan Francisco supervisor candidate

Mixed or conditional

Patel said San Francisco should not renew Flock's contract unless the system is better regulated and shown to be effective.

“I would not renew Flock because it's a violation of our personal privacy”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)We asked candidates if San Francisco should keep Flock surveillanceCandidate responses under support, opposition, and no position

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

Where this statement fits

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Interview

We asked candidates if San Francisco should keep Flock surveillance (opens in a new tab)Candidate responses under support, opposition, and no position

About this source

The San Francisco Standard asked local candidates whether the city should renew its Flock contract and recorded their differing answers.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Patel compared Flock with cameras that record only traffic violations.

After the quotation

She questioned whether Flock has improved public safety.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

She rejects the current arrangement but leaves room for a regulated version.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Jacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay

Jacob Burnett

“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Darshini Patel, Patel opposes Flock renewal without better regulationDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Patel opposes Flock renewal without better regulation
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/2963-patel-said-san-francisco-should-not-renew-flock

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Patel opposes Flock renewal without better regulation". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/2963-patel-said-san-francisco-should-not-renew-flock