Giannoulias favors ALPR tools with strict limits

Illinois secretary of state

“This is not about taking useful tools away from law enforcement.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Giannoulias supports Senate scrutiny of surveillance networksQuotes by Alexi Giannoulias

Source and context

Official statement

Giannoulias supports Senate scrutiny of surveillance networks (opens in a new tab)Quotes by Alexi Giannoulias

About this source

Giannoulias calls for data-sharing limits and accountability while retaining ALPRs as a law-enforcement tool.

Before the quotation

Giannoulias spoke as a U.S. Senate subcommittee examined Flock's network.

After the quotation

His office described prior Illinois limits on immigration and reproductive-health searches.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

He distinguishes a useful investigative tool from an unchecked national surveillance network.

Recorded on
Published here
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement