Davis says keep ALPR cameras with accountability rules

Hazel Crest police chief and NOBLE president

“Instead of focusing on eliminating the cameras, make sure that there's proper guidelines and proper accountability for misuse of the cameras.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Flock surveillance cameras become midterm campaign target as voters balk at tech companies' powerCandidate and company statements in the full article

Source and context

Reporting

Flock surveillance cameras become midterm campaign target as voters balk at tech companies' power (opens in a new tab)Candidate and company statements in the full article

About this source

Associated Press original reporting compares 2026 candidates' views on banning, funding, and restricting Flock-style cameras. The article quotes several candidates and Flock directly; positions are attributed separately.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

AP interviewed Davis about communities ending ALPR contracts.

After the quotation

He described the technology as valuable while acknowledging misuse concerns.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case concerns whether networked plate readers should operate. Davis favors keeping them, but ties that support to governance and accountability.

Recorded on
Published here
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement