Mackenzie seeks bipartisan camera guardrails
Ryan MackenzieU.S. representative and 2026 Republican House candidate in Pennsylvania
Mackenzie raised concerns about extensive private collection of travel data and proposed bipartisan guardrails rather than eliminating the technology.
“I will be working with members on both sides to explore commonsense guardrails for these technologies to protect all Americans.”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Original candidate interviews and quoted campaign statements; syndicated text
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The Center Square asked candidates in competitive Pennsylvania House races about Flock cameras.
After the quotation
He also contrasted fixed Flock networks with plate readers used in police cruisers.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Mackenzie raised concerns about private collection of travel data and said he would work with members of both parties on guardrails. Guardrails rather than elimination fit Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJacob Burnett says Flock-style cameras should be done away with, with warrants required if they stay
“The systems themselves can be modified to prevent nearly all abuse and be made more secure by requiring warrants for access or follow through on any data the systems collect and have all data stored on the hardware itself preventing viewing from remote locations, requiring strict login credentials and a connecting warrant number to access. These are common sense changes that if the systems are to be used I feel could correct a lot of abuse or privacy concerns but I also feel the systems should be done away with overall, especially in the realm of predictive crime analytics.”Read statement
Dean Brewer, an independent candidate for Tennessee governor, says Flock cameras should be banned
“I believe flock cameras should be banned.”Read statement
Buddy Carter says license plate cameras help investigators but need privacy safeguards
“Technologies like license plate recognition cameras can provide valuable investigative tools, but they have also raised important questions about privacy and government oversight. As these systems become more common, it is important to balance public safety with appropriate safeguards that protect individual privacy.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Mackenzie seeks bipartisan camera guardrails
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/2878-mackenzie-raised-concerns-about-extensive-private-collection-of
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Mackenzie seeks bipartisan camera guardrails". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/2878-mackenzie-raised-concerns-about-extensive-private-collection-of