Mackenzie seeks bipartisan camera guardrails
U.S. representative and 2026 Republican House candidate in Pennsylvania
“I will be working with members on both sides to explore commonsense guardrails for these technologies to protect all Americans.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Original candidate interviews and quoted campaign statements; syndicated text
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The Center Square asked candidates in competitive Pennsylvania House races about Flock cameras.
After the quotation
He also contrasted fixed Flock networks with plate readers used in police cruisers.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Mackenzie raised concerns about private collection of travel data and said he would work with members of both parties on guardrails. Guardrails rather than elimination fit Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement