Nixon campaign platform proposes limits on ALPR use

2026 Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Florida

“I will fight for federal standards requiring a warrant before ALPR or similar location data can be accessed in most circumstances.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Angie Nixon for U.S. Senate priorities on privacy and surveillanceProtect privacy and end surveillance section

Source and context

Official statement

Angie Nixon for U.S. Senate priorities on privacy and surveillance (opens in a new tab)Protect privacy and end surveillance section

About this source

Protect privacy and end surveillance section

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Nixon's undated campaign platform, available on September 26, addresses ALPR systems including Flock under privacy and surveillance.

After the quotation

The platform permits some use under restrictions; it does not call for an outright ban.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Nixon's platform called for a federal warrant requirement before license-plate reader data can be accessed in most circumstances, along with deletion limits and community consent. Permitting use under restrictions fits Mixed or conditional.

Recorded on
Published here
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement