Senate vote: Yea on H.Con.Res. 89 (Iran war powers)

U.S. Senator, Maryland

“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50)

Source and context

Official statement

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 244: H.Con.Res. 89, Iran War Powers Resolution (rejected, 49-50) (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Official Senate roll call on H.Con.Res. 89, a concurrent resolution directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. Rejected 49-50 on September 24, 2026. Fetterman was the only Democratic nay; Republicans Collins, Murkowski, Paul and Tillis voted yea; Alsobrooks did not vote.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

On September 24, 2026, the Senate voted on H.Con.Res. 89, a concurrent resolution directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. The House had adopted the resolution 214-208 on July 23, 2026. The Senate rejected it 49-50.

After the quotation

Because H.Con.Res. 89 is a concurrent resolution, it would not have been presented to the President even if it had passed the Senate.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Do they support the war in Iran?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Voted to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to end U.S. involvement absent congressional authorization.

Recorded on
Published here
A U.S. Air Force fighter configured for combat operations during Operation Epic Fury.
Credit: U.S. Air Force / U.S. Central Command

Do they support the war in Iran?

Explore the case context, sources and public responses.

Read the full case

More from this case

Read the full case

Scott Singer

“Scott strongly supports the President's strong response to threats from China, Russia, and Iran that have brought peace through strength here and across the globe.”
Read statement

Brian Shaver

“conflict in Iran drove fertilizer and fuel costs sky-high right before planting season”
Read statement