Sriram Krishnan says frontier AI researchers sincerely believe their warnings
Sriram KrishnanPublic post on Sriram Krishnan's individual account; the post does not identify itself as a formal government or institutional statement.
Krishnan says frontier researchers he has encountered sincerely believe their warnings, while challenging the idea that one company or school of thought should represent the entire industry. He calls for perspectives from open-model developers, cybersecurity practitioners, and chipmakers.
“I find them to be intellectually honest in terms of believing what they say.”
Original post
Where this statement fits
Is Anthropic acting responsibly while advancing toward recursive self-improvement?
Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic and said that Anthropic and OpenAI are acting irresponsibly by racing toward self-improving superintelligence. In a fuller interview, he praised Anthropic's current practices and denied that it was already cutting corners; his criticism concerns the competitive race and the pressures he expects it to create. Responses dispute the evidence and timing of catastrophic-risk forecasts, whether continued work inside AI labs can be justified, and whether governments should pause development or regulate its continuation. The record distinguishes these disagreements from arguments about the rhetoric of public warnings.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Full primary public post and available surrounding thread. Speaker and position scope are explained in the linked event.
Before the quotation
The post addresses interpretations of the circulating researcher warnings as insincere and refers to his experience with researchers at Anthropic, OpenAI, and elsewhere near the frontier.
After the quotation
Krishnan argues that the discourse is overly centralized and seeks broader perspectives. He does not endorse or reject a particular extinction probability or directly judge Anthropic's current conduct.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Challenges claims of insincerity and industry-wide consensus; broader discussion, not an exoneration of Anthropic.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseCoxon criticizes startup norms in frontier AI development
“The companies run on a startup mindset: Move fast, break things, fix them later.”Read statement
Nathan Lambert distinguishes inference scaling from recursive self-improvement
“I was underestimating how much we are likely to scale inference-time compute in the near future, but this is different than RSI and I have not seen enough to convince me that an intelligence explosion is near.”Read statement
Gary Marcus says Dario Amodei has lost credibility
“Top three ways Dario Amodei has blown his credibility in seven days. I hate to say it, but President Trump was right, Dario is only pretending to be a perfect little angel.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Sriram Krishnan says frontier AI researchers sincerely believe their warnings
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/246-krishnan-says-frontier-researchers-he-has-encountered-sincerely
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Sriram Krishnan says frontier AI researchers sincerely believe their warnings". First published: 2026-09-10. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/246-krishnan-says-frontier-researchers-he-has-encountered-sincerely