Hilton declines to say whether Bianco took the right step in seizing the ballots

Republican candidate for governor of California

“I'm not going to weigh in on something that I don't have the knowledge of the facts on. I trust that Chad is interested in what we should all be interested in, which is ensuring the integrity of our elections and restoring faith in our elections in California.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)The California Governor Primary Debate (CNN transcript, May 5, 2026, 10-11p ET) · CNNTranscript, exchange beginning with the moderator's question to Xavier Becerra about the lawsuit against Sheriff Bianco (about 22:08-22:11 ET)

Source and context

Original text

The California Governor Primary Debate (CNN transcript, May 5, 2026, 10-11p ET) (opens in a new tab) · CNNTranscript, exchange beginning with the moderator's question to Xavier Becerra about the lawsuit against Sheriff Bianco (about 22:08-22:11 ET)

About this source

CNN's transcript of the televised Democratic and Republican gubernatorial debate. Moderator Kaitlan Collins asked Xavier Becerra and Steve Hilton about Sheriff Chad Bianco's seizure of the Riverside County ballots, and Bianco replied.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Moderator Kaitlan Collins asked Hilton to clarify whether Sheriff Bianco took the right step in seizing the ballots, after Xavier Becerra said Bianco had violated the law.

After the quotation

Hilton then said he supports voter ID and turned to allegations about Becerra's former chief of staff.

How this statement is classified

Explicitly stayed out

Case context: Was Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's seizure of about 650,000 ballots lawful?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the sheriff's seizure and handling of the ballots. Hilton was asked directly whether the seizure was the right step and expressly declined to weigh in; his expression of trust in Bianco's interest in election integrity does not say the seizure was lawful or justified.

Recorded on
Published here
Editorial composite of Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco beside the California Supreme Court opinion in the ballot-seizure case.
Credit: Riverside County Sheriff's Office; Supreme Court of California; composite by The Dispute Index

More from this case

Read the full case

Campaign Legal Center

“Sheriff Bianco’s illegal seizure of ballots is a dangerous escalation and blatantly unlawful intrusion by law enforcement … In Riverside County and a growing number of localities across the country, actions like this risk disrupting critical chain of custody procedures, endangering sensitive voter data, sidestepping recount and contest procedures, and amplifying baseless claims, ultimately undermining the freedom to vote.”
Read statement

Gavin Newsom

“Governor Gavin Newsom today released the following statement in response to the California Supreme Court ruling Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco illegally seized hundreds of thousands of ballots from last year’s special election … Today’s ruling affirms that in California we will defend democracy — using every branch of government. And the new laws I signed just last week add new protections so attacks like this cannot happen again. People deserve to know their ballot is counted and secure, and in California we will do everything we can to protect that constitutional right — this year, and beyond.”
Read statement

Rob Bonta

“Election fraud can and should be investigated. But misuse of criminal investigative tools — without any evidence that a crime was committed — needlessly undermines trust in our elections system and in law enforcement. After the Sheriff took the extraordinary step of obtaining warrants to seize control over voted ballots, I made a modest request to him: pause your investigation, preserve all evidence, and provide the information needed for my office to review the allegations. Instead, Sheriff Bianco pressed forward with the seizure of hundreds of thousands of ballots. The Court has now made clear that this kind of defiance cannot stand, that the Attorney General has the authority to intervene when sheriffs take improper action, and that voted ballots belong in the custody of elections officials.”
Read statement