Pocock asks why AI companies aren't held liable "the way an Australian hacker would be"

Independent Senator for the Australian Capital Territory

“There is also a big question here around why we aren't holding these big tech companies liable for this kind of data breach. If it was an Australian who hacked the system they'd likely be heading for jail, yet there's no accountability for AI companies developing this technology.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Statement on OpenAI Medicare hack · David PocockFull text of Senator Pocock's official statement.

Source and context

Official statement

Statement on OpenAI Medicare hack (opens in a new tab) · David PocockFull text of Senator Pocock's official statement.

About this source

David Pocock's official statement, posted to his Senate website, on the OpenAI Medicare breach, criticizing both the shelved National AI Safety Act and the absence of liability for AI companies.

Before the quotation

Pocock called the breach "very concerning but ultimately unsurprising," and said it highlighted how slow the government has been to implement AI safeguards, including shelving a planned National AI Safety Act.

After the quotation

He said current draft standards are "pretty light" on requiring AI companies to disclose hacks or other high-risk breaches by their AI agents.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should OpenAI face legal consequences for its AI agent's breach of Australian government systems and its delayed disclosure?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Pocock directly argues OpenAI and comparable AI companies should face liability comparable to what an individual hacker would face, condemning the absence of accountability rather than merely describing the incident.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
OpenAI

More from this case

Read the full case

Mehdi Hasan

“I don't understand. Why is no one being prosecuted for this? Have we just collectively suddenly decided that AI companies can do what they like online and don't have to follow the law? Wouldn't we be prosecuted if we 'infiltrated' a government website??”
Read statement

Lizzie O'Shea

“There have to be guardrails and safety measures in place which are way ahead of the capability which is being developed.”
Read statement

Mehreen Faruqi

“This breach by a foreign AI company on an Australian government database is deeply alarming and brings home the risks that these out-of-control tech corporations pose.”
Read statement