John Ondrasik calls Boy George’s AI use “common in the music business”

John OndrasikSinger-songwriter publishing signed Washington Post opinion commentary

John Ondrasik defended Boy George and treated his AI use as common rather than disqualifying.

Responding to

Boy George remained the song’s author because he wrote its lyrics and melody and used AI as a creative collaborator.

“Whatever you think of AI, the practice is common in the music business these days.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)John Ondrasik defends Boy George and calls AI use common in music
Musician Boy George photographed at an event in 2013

Where this statement fits

Did Boy George remain the author of an AI-generated song?

Bandcamp removed Boy George's “We Will Dance Again” under a policy barring music generated wholly or substantially by AI. Boy George had disclosed using AI but said he wrote the lyrics and melody, treated AI as a collaborator, and remained the song's author. He challenged the platform's ability to detect and consistently police AI music. Bandcamp cited its preexisting AI rule. Boy George also alleged that political objections to the song's pro-Israel message prompted the removal; the available record does not establish that motive.

Read the full case

Case updates

Boy George's AI song and Bandcamp: the next turn

We'll email you if Bandcamp revisits the removal, Boy George releases his live-musician version, or either side adds to the authorship dispute.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

John Ondrasik defends Boy George and calls AI use common in music (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Signed opinion defending Boy George and the song while treating the Bandcamp dispute as secondary to the political backlash.

Before the quotation

Ondrasik describes the hostility Boy George faced over the song’s pro-Israel message.

After the quotation

He calls the Bandcamp dispute a sideshow, making this defense weaker on the precise platform-policy question.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The signed commentary normalizes the disputed production method while defending the artist and song.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Boy George

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: John Ondrasik, John Ondrasik calls Boy George’s AI use “common in the music business”Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
John Ondrasik calls Boy George’s AI use “common in the music business”
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/169-john-ondrasik-defended-boy-george-and-treated-his

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "John Ondrasik calls Boy George’s AI use “common in the music business”". First published: 2026-09-18. Last updated: 2026-09-18. https://disputeindex.com/events/169-john-ondrasik-defended-boy-george-and-treated-his