Garcia asks what Kremlev “get in return” for spending “hundreds of thousands of dollars”
U.S. Representative for California and ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, on X
“spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on the President's son. What did he get in return? We need answers.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
NBC News' report, read in full on 2026-09-22, published the evening of September 14, 2026, the day Bettina Trump's Instagram post and President Trump's statement to NBC both appeared. It also gives background on Kremlev's history with the Trump family and the 2016 Trump Tower meeting.
Before the quotation
Garcia posted the same week Bettina Trump's Instagram acknowledgment and ProPublica's report became public.
After the quotation
Garcia separately sent a letter to the White House and Trump Jr. demanding information, according to Politico.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should the Senate Judiciary Committee Subpoena Donald Trump Jr. Over His Kremlev-Funded Wedding Celebration?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to whether Donald Trump Jr.'s acceptance of a Kremlev-funded wedding celebration was improper, Garcia directly questions what Kremlev received in exchange for his spending and demands answers, expressing suspicion of the arrangement rather than accepting it as ordinary.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should the Senate Judiciary Committee Subpoena Donald Trump Jr. Over His Kremlev-Funded Wedding Celebration?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“A toaster is a wedding gift. A private-island party paid for by a Putin-connected oligarch is something else. Republicans nearly wore out the subpoena machine investigating Hunter Biden's foreign relationships. We should not unplug it now. The country should not have to accept one standard for the family of a Republican president and another for the family of a Democratic president. Nor should congressional oversight begin and end when control of the White House changes hands.”Read statement
“It's totally allowed. And a lot of people have parties and all. But, as I understand it, he paid them back. I hear he paid them back. That's very common. I've given wedding parties to numerous people.”Read statement
“I have no idea who Umar is, never heard of him, and he didn’t pay for Don and Bettina’s wedding, which took place at a totally different location, and on a different day from the wedding. It was an ‘afterparty’ given in their honor. Not a big deal! I was not present at the party.”Read statement