Vance calls the exclusion “basic fairness” and says it's “totally appropriate”
JD VanceVice President of the United States, speaking to reporters
Speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews, Vice President JD Vance said Trump is “not banning media outlets” but declining to give outlets that engage in what he called “propaganda” special access, comparing Politico's treatment to how Breitbart was not given White House press-pool access under the Obama and Biden administrations. He said the outlets "could still report" and retained free-speech rights, and called the exclusion "basic fairness" and "totally appropriate."
“He's not banning media outlets. What he's doing is saying, ‘we're not going to give you special access to the White House if you engage in what is effectively propaganda.’ If you're going to engage in what is effectively far-left propaganda, why would a Republican White House give you special access? could still report on the Trump White House. They can still get the public reports. They can still, of course, talk to people inside the administration and outside of the administration. Why on God's green earth would Donald Trump be expected to give Politico special access when nobody in the media expected the Biden administration or the Obama administration to give Breitbart special access? It's about basic fairness. They can still report. They still have the access to free speech. They're just not going to get an office in the White House anymore, and I think it's totally appropriate, unless of course, they start to behave like real news organizations.”
Reporting

Where this statement fits
Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?
On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that, "effective immediately, I am banning" CNN, MS NOW and Politico "from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" About an hour later, in the Oval Office, he said no particular story prompted the decision, that he does not want the outlets "in my office," and that "somebody has a right to keep them away" if outlets write false stories. The three outlets and press-freedom groups oppose the exclusion, citing constitutional protection for the press, and the White House Correspondents' Association said it "stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO." On Saturday, September 19, MS NOW, CNN and Politico said their White House reporters were refused entry and had press passes confiscated; the White House referred questions to Trump's earlier remarks. The dispute is over whether President Trump should exclude named news organizations from White House access over what they report.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
The National Desk's report, which cites The Hill for Vance's remarks to reporters at Joint Base Andrews on Monday, September 21, 2026, and separately reports Scalise's, Waltz's and Barrasso's earlier Sunday-show remarks.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Vance spoke Monday, three days after Trump's announcement and the same day CNN, MS NOW and Politico filed their lawsuit.
After the quotation
The National Desk's report also covers earlier Sunday-show remarks by Scalise, Waltz and Barrasso, already recorded as separate position-events.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to Trump's decision to exclude CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House access because of their coverage, Vance directly argues the exclusion is justified as "basic fairness" and "totally appropriate," excusing it as a withdrawal of special access rather than a restriction on reporting or speech.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- CNN, MS NOW, Politico
More from this case
Read the full caseFreedom of the Press Foundation calls the ruling a "stinging defeat" for the press ban
Freedom of the Press Foundation
“This decision is a stinging defeat for Trump's assault on the free press and a powerful vindication of the First Amendment. As Judge Kelly recognized, presidents don't get to use their power to purge journalists because they don't like what they report.”Read statement
Reporters Committee says the injunction ends a "blatantly unconstitutional attempt" to punish news outlets
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
“The court has put an end to a blatantly unconstitutional attempt to punish news outlets for coverage the president doesn't like. The decision protects not only CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, but all the other holders of White House passes who continued to work under the threat of retaliation — and of course the public, which deserves timely and accurate information from a press corps free from government intimidation.”Read statement
CNN chief Mark Thompson says the network will fight the ban "to the end"
“To me, it's a vote of confidence in free speech and our right, not really so much for ourselves but on behalf of the public everywhere ... No matter how many court cases, investigations, court appearances, and all the expense that that entails, we will fight this one to the end”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Vance calls the exclusion “basic fairness” and says it's “totally appropriate”
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/1426-speaking-to-reporters-at-joint-base-andrews-vice
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Vance calls the exclusion “basic fairness” and says it's “totally appropriate”". First published: 2026-09-22. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1426-speaking-to-reporters-at-joint-base-andrews-vice