IRE’s Jonathan Kealing calls the ban part of “a series of illegal moves” and urges solidarity
Investigative Reporters and EditorsNonprofit organization for investigative journalists, in a press release quoting executive director Jonathan Kealing
Investigative Reporters and Editors condemned the ban as apparent retaliation for coverage, saying it flouts a federal appeals court ruling that the White House cannot revoke press access without a compelling reason. In a quotation from Executive Director Jonathan Kealing, it called the ban “just another in a series of illegal moves” and asked investigative reporters and editors across the country to stand in solidarity with the affected outlets.
“Time and again, we’ve seen this administration try to marginalize and exclude those seeking to fairly report on its actions and their impacts. This is just another in a series of illegal moves to try and thwart journalists’ First Amendment rights, and we won’t stand idly by while it happens. We applaud the organizations standing up for their ability to report from and on the White House without fear or favor and call on investigative reporters and editors across the country to stand in solidarity with their colleagues experiencing these harmful actions.”
Official statement
Reporting

Where this statement fits
Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?
On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that, "effective immediately, I am banning" CNN, MS NOW and Politico "from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" About an hour later, in the Oval Office, he said no particular story prompted the decision, that he does not want the outlets "in my office," and that "somebody has a right to keep them away" if outlets write false stories. The three outlets and press-freedom groups oppose the exclusion, citing constitutional protection for the press, and the White House Correspondents' Association said it "stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO." On Saturday, September 19, MS NOW, CNN and Politico said their White House reporters were refused entry and had press passes confiscated; the White House referred questions to Trump's earlier remarks. The dispute is over whether President Trump should exclude named news organizations from White House access over what they report.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
IRE's press release of September 19, 2026, which says it joins the Society of Professional Journalists, the National Press Club and other organizations in calling for the President to reverse the decision immediately.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
Editor & Publisher's survey of responses to the ban by press associations, press-freedom groups and news organizations, including statements by RTDNA, SPJ, IRE and the National Press Club and Jeff Jarvis's CNN appearance.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The release, dated September 19, said the ban was made in apparent retaliation for coverage and that President Trump had threatened that other outlets would also be banned.
After the quotation
IRE said it joined the Society of Professional Journalists, the National Press Club and other organizations in calling for the President to immediately reverse his decision.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
On Trump’s decision to exclude CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House access because of their coverage, IRE condemns the exclusion, calls it illegal, and calls on others to stand in solidarity with the outlets. No competing label plausibly applies.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Donald Trump
More from this case
Read the full caseBoutrous distinguishes pool-size limits from retaliation for reporting
“It’s retaliation for speech. That violates the First Amendment.”Read statement
White House says no journalist has a right to Oval Office or Air Force One access
The White House
“No person and no journalist has a constitutional right to access to the President's Oval Office, Air Force One, or other sensitive and private facilities.”Read statement
Schiff says White House press exclusions also harm the public
“When a reporter is denied access to the White House, it isn't just that news organization that suffers. The American people rely on a free press to know what their government is up to, and whether it is acting wisely and lawfully.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- IRE’s Jonathan Kealing calls the ban part of “a series of illegal moves” and urges solidarity
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/1331-investigative-reporters-and-editors-condemned-the-ban-as
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "IRE’s Jonathan Kealing calls the ban part of “a series of illegal moves” and urges solidarity". First published: 2026-09-21. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1331-investigative-reporters-and-editors-condemned-the-ban-as