Mike Waltz says Trump is “absolutely within his rights” to bar the three outlets

Mike WaltzU.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, interviewed on CNN’s State of the Union

Defended or excused

Asked on CNN’s State of the Union whether he was comfortable with the ban, Waltz, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said Trump is “absolutely within his rights” to limit journalists’ access to government facilities when he believes they are not acting in good faith. He cited Zemel v. Rusk for the proposition that the right to publish does not include a right of access to any government facility, and said the president was “absolutely spot on.” Pressed by Bash, he said the prior administration had also limited outlets it deemed right-wing and distinguished “negative reporting” from “garbage gossip journalism” built on anonymous sources.

“the president is absolutely within his rights to limit journalists to government facilities, particularly when, in his opinion, they're not behaving as good faith journalists. And that's just not his opinion. That's the Supreme Court's opinion. There are multiple cases, Zemel v. Rusk off the top of my head, and I'm not a lawyer, that said, look, you can have the ability to speak, you can have the ability to publish as an open and free press, but you don't have an inherent right to any government facility that you want, whether it's Langley or the White House. And so I will leave it to the lawyers, but I think the president's absolutely spot on here.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)CNN State of the Union, Sept. 20, 2026: interview with Ambassador Mike Waltz on the White House press ban · CNNWaltz interview, from Dana Bash's question “On Friday, President Trump banned CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House” to “garbage gossip journalism”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Republicans back Trump's ban of liberal news outlets from White HouseFull article

Case updates

Following the CNN, MS NOW and Politico White House access fight?

We'll email you if the court rules on the outlets' injunction request, if the White House changes how it enforces the ban, or if the outlets report new denials.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Symbolic editorial illustration of three broadcast cameras outside the White House gate at dusk.
Credit: The Dispute Index / AI-assisted illustration.

Where this statement fits

Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?

On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that, "effective immediately, I am banning" CNN, MS NOW and Politico "from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" About an hour later, in the Oval Office, he said no particular story prompted the decision, that he does not want the outlets "in my office," and that "somebody has a right to keep them away" if outlets write false stories. The three outlets and press-freedom groups oppose the exclusion, citing constitutional protection for the press, and the White House Correspondents' Association said it "stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO." On Saturday, September 19, MS NOW, CNN and Politico said their White House reporters were refused entry and had press passes confiscated; the White House referred questions to Trump's earlier remarks. The dispute is over whether President Trump should exclude named news organizations from White House access over what they report.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

CNN State of the Union, Sept. 20, 2026: interview with Ambassador Mike Waltz on the White House press ban (opens in a new tab) · CNNWaltz interview, from Dana Bash's question “On Friday, President Trump banned CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House” to “garbage gossip journalism”

About this source

CNN's transcript of State of the Union with Dana Bash, which aired September 20, 2026 at 9 a.m. ET. Bash introduces Waltz as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations; the transcript's speaker label for him reads “U.S. national security adviser.” Bash's questions on the ban open the second half of the interview.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Republicans back Trump's ban of liberal news outlets from White House (opens in a new tab)Full article

About this source

The Washington Times' roundup of Sunday-show remarks on the ban by Mike Waltz on CNN, Steve Scalise on ABC, Sen. John Barrasso on NBC, FIRE's Conor Fitzpatrick on ABC and Weijia Jiang on Fox News.

Before the quotation

Host Dana Bash had asked: “On Friday, President Trump banned CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House. The president, as I mentioned, is about to host the Chinese leader. Historically, it was the United States pushing countries like China for greater press freedoms. Now President Trump is the one backsliding on these rights. Are you comfortable with this?”

After the quotation

Bash noted that Waltz is a decorated veteran who served 27 years in the Green Berets “defending freedoms like the First Amendment.” Waltz replied that the president does not believe the outlets are acting in good faith and that he had seen one use “anonymous sources referencing someone who’s dead.” The same morning on ABC, FIRE’s Conor Fitzpatrick cited Sherrill v. Knight (1977) and last year’s Associated Press case for the opposite conclusion.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

On Trump’s decision to exclude CNN, MS NOW and Politico from White House access because of their coverage, Waltz defends the decision. He says Trump is “absolutely within his rights,” grounds that in a legal argument that access to a government facility is distinct from the right to publish, and endorses the ban outright (“absolutely spot on”) while conceding he is “not a lawyer.” The closest competing label is “Challenged the characterization”, because he also disputes Bash’s framing of the ban as backsliding on press freedom; it loses because he goes on to defend the action itself rather than only its description.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Donald Trump

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Mike Waltz, Mike Waltz says Trump is “absolutely within his rights” to bar the three outletsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Mike Waltz says Trump is “absolutely within his rights” to bar the three outlets
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1324-asked-on-cnn-s-state-of-the-union

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Mike Waltz says Trump is “absolutely within his rights” to bar the three outlets". First published: 2026-09-21. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1324-asked-on-cnn-s-state-of-the-union