Barrasso says Trump’s ban does not violate the Constitution

John BarrassoU.S. senator from Wyoming, speaking on NBC News’s Meet the Press.

Asked whether Trump’s exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico reporters violated the Constitution, Sen. John Barrasso said no and argued that the press must report fairly. He also said he respects freedom of the press and compared the action to Trump’s earlier social-media bans.

“No, I believe the press has an obligation to report fairly.”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)John Barrasso says President Trump banning media outlets doesn’t violate the U.S. ConstitutionFull 02:23 NBC News Meet the Press clip.

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the Constitution by banning reporters from the White HouseParagraphs beginning “Asked directly whether the president had violated the Constitution” and “Pressed again on whether he agreed with Trump’s ban.”
Symbolic editorial illustration of three broadcast cameras outside the White House gate at dusk.
Credit: The Dispute Index / AI-assisted illustration.

Where this statement fits

Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?

On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that, "effective immediately, I am banning" CNN, MS NOW and Politico "from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" About an hour later, in the Oval Office, he said no particular story prompted the decision, that he does not want the outlets "in my office," and that "somebody has a right to keep them away" if outlets write false stories. The three outlets and press-freedom groups oppose the exclusion, citing constitutional protection for the press, and the White House Correspondents' Association said it "stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO." On Saturday, September 19, MS NOW, CNN and Politico said their White House reporters were refused entry and had press passes confiscated; the White House referred questions to Trump's earlier remarks. The dispute is over whether President Trump should exclude named news organizations from White House access over what they report.

Read the full case

Case updates

Following the CNN, MS NOW and Politico White House access fight?

We'll email you if the court rules on the outlets' injunction request, if the White House changes how it enforces the ban, or if the outlets report new denials.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original video

John Barrasso says President Trump banning media outlets doesn’t violate the U.S. Constitution (opens in a new tab)Full 02:23 NBC News Meet the Press clip.

About this source

NBC’s original clip captures Barrasso responding to a question about Trump’s exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico. NBC’s companion report transcribes the exchange.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the Constitution by banning reporters from the White House (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs beginning “Asked directly whether the president had violated the Constitution” and “Pressed again on whether he agreed with Trump’s ban.”

About this source

NBC News reports and transcribes Barrasso’s Meet the Press answer, including his qualification that the press is constitutionally protected and his comparison to Trump’s social-media bans.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

NBC reports that Barrasso was asked directly whether Trump had violated the Constitution by banning reporters from the three outlets.

After the quotation

When pressed about whether he agreed with the ban, Barrasso said the press is constitutionally protected but repeated that it has an obligation to report fairly and said Trump did not see that happening.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Barrasso’s direct no-answer to the constitutional question and his fairness rationale defend that action, while his acknowledgment of press freedom supplies context.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Donald Trump

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Barrasso says Trump’s ban does not violate the Constitution
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/1300-asked-whether-trump-s-exclusion-of-cnn-ms

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Barrasso says Trump’s ban does not violate the Constitution". First published: 2026-09-21. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1300-asked-whether-trump-s-exclusion-of-cnn-ms