John Solomon says there is “a pretty good, strong body of evidence” against Omar and expects it to be made public
Founder and editor in chief of Just the News, who says in the interview that he chairs the White House Government Transparency Task Force
“There’s a pretty good, strong body of evidence.” … “got turned down on the grounds that there’s an ongoing investigation. So, that’s the first time we knew that it was under investigation.” … “I suspect we’ll be able to make it public soon.”
Source and context
Original video
About this source
Newsmax’s video of an interview with John Solomon, posted at 8:56 p.m. EDT on September 14, 2026 (00:56 UTC on September 15); the video does not show when the interview aired. Solomon says in it that he chairs the White House Government Transparency Task Force; the video’s headline calls him a “Trump adviser.”
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
Just the News reports that ICE withheld records responsive to the outlet’s January 2026 Freedom of Information Act request about any ICE investigation into the allegation that Omar married a relative. John Solomon, who is quoted in this case, leads Just the News.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Official statement
About this source
ICE’s May 12, 2026 letter to John Solomon withholding in full, under FOIA Exemption 7(A), records about “allegations of immigration fraud involving a member of Congress marrying a relative from 2016-2021.” The letter does not name Omar; Just the News identifies the request as concerning her. The exemption is not a statement about the merits of any allegation.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The interviewer told Solomon, “this has been pushed off as a far-right conspiracy theory, but turns out it’s not.” Just the News, which Solomon leads, reported on August 12 that ICE had withheld records responsive to its January request under an exemption for pending enforcement proceedings.
After the quotation
Solomon said in the same interview that “if Mark Wayne Mullin is correct about the evidence” Omar could have gained citizenship “through false pretenses.” ICE’s May 12 letter to Solomon does not name Omar and says disclosure “could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.”
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Trump administration officials publicly accuse Rep. Ilhan Omar of immigration fraud?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case’s fixed reference point is the Trump administration’s public accusation that Rep. Ilhan Omar married her brother to obtain immigration benefits, together with its announced federal criminal investigation of her. Solomon asserts that there is a strong body of evidence, says the records were withheld because of an ongoing investigation, says he expects the evidence to be made public, and describes a path to Omar’s deportation. That supports the accusation and the announced investigation. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because his description of denaturalization depends on whether Mullin is correct about the evidence; it loses because that condition applies to a later step, while he asserts now that a strong body of evidence exists.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Ilhan Omar, Markwayne Mullin
Should Trump administration officials publicly accuse Rep. Ilhan Omar of immigration fraud?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Why don’t you follow up with them and ask them what is the information that they have” … “The right wing has always had this shit going, so I don’t really worry about it. You have a good day.”Read statement
“Ilhan Omar SNAPPED at Reporter Asking Her If She’s About to Get DEPORTED” … “The Congresswoman melted down, denied there was an active investigation and ran away into an elevator.” … “It’s been confirmed by: -VP JD Vance -DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin -AG Todd Blanche -Border Czar Tom Homan -Stephen Miller” … “Send her back.”Read statement
“One word: Deport.”Read statement