Joel Valdez says DCAS count change reflects "temporary data disruptions" and calls NYT report a "non-story"
Acting Pentagon press secretary at the time (now Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary), in a statement provided to The New York Times and posted by Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell on his official X account
“The Department of War is aware of temporary data disruptions on the Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS) website. These site anomalies are currently being resolved in coordination with the Military Services. The Department attempted to explain the anomalies to the New York Times ahead of publication, but given their lack of knowledge in this area, they proceeded to write a non-story that will be fixed imminently. We remain committed to ensuring the utmost accuracy of all casualty reporting.”
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell's official X account (government-verified). Read through api.fxtwitter.com (created Fri Jul 24 01:39:04 +0000 2026) and rendered in a web browser, which shows '9:39 PM · Jul 23, 2026' (EDT). The quoted block is attributed by Parnell to @JoelValdezDOW and introduced as 'the truth, provided to the New York Times today'; Parnell's own sentences around it are not Valdez's words and are excluded. The attached image is a screenshot of the Times headline. archive.today's timemap lists a capture dated 2026-07-24 22:56:50 UTC (http://archive.today/20260724225650/https://x.com/SeanParnellASW/status/2080467772694265963), but archive.today throttled the fetch (HTTP 429) twice, so it was not read and is not offered as archivedURL.
Reporting
About this source
Paywalled (403 to curl). Read from the archive.today capture of 2026-09-05 13:04:16 UTC (dated 'July 23, 2026') and from The Seattle Times' syndicated copy (https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/number-of-u-s-troop-deaths-suddenly-appears-lower-on-pentagon-website/, 'July 23, 2026 at 6:00 pm' PDT). The Times prints only fragments of Valdez's email, in its own capitalisation ('The department', 'The New York Times') and stops its quotation at 'non-story', omitting 'that will be fixed imminently'; the fuller text is Parnell's post. It calls Valdez 'the acting press secretary for the Pentagon'.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
Bylined 'July 24, 2026, 8:55 PM' (JSON-LD datePublished 2026-07-25T00:55:33Z). ABC renders the department as 'Department of Defense' and 'military services' where Parnell's post says 'Department of War' and 'Military Services'; the record uses Parnell's text. ABC independently reports the first two sentences as a statement by Valdez.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
Published 2026-07-26 7:58 p.m. EDT, updated 11:12 p.m. EDT. Used only for contextAfter. It attributes 'site anomalies are currently being resolved' to Parnell because his post repeated the wording; the block quote is attributed to Valdez in the post itself.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The New York Times reported on July 23, 2026 that the Pentagon's casualty website showed 18 U.S. service members killed in the Iran war on Wednesday, July 22, and 14 by Thursday, and that three military officials said one reason was a decision to remove four service members killed the previous weekend (three in Jordan, one in northern Iraq) because their deaths came after the April ceasefire. Valdez's statement addresses the accuracy of the department's public DCAS count in that July episode; it predates the Washington Post's Sept. 18 report on additional deaths and is not a response to it.
After the quotation
By July 26, the DCAS site listed the four deaths under a separate "Overseas Operations Casualties" category, apart from the 14 listed under Operation Epic Fury.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Is the Pentagon's public count of U.S. military deaths in the Iran war complete?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case's fixed reference point is the Defense Department's public accounting of U.S. military deaths in the Iran war, as published in the Defense Casualty Analysis System. In July, when four deaths dropped out of the Operation Epic Fury tally, Valdez attributes the change to temporary data disruptions and site anomalies being resolved, calls the Times' report a non-story, and says the department is committed to the utmost accuracy of casualty reporting, which excuses the discrepancy as technical and defends the accounting. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because he disputes the Times' account of what happened. That loses because the statement goes beyond disputing a description: it explains the change as a data glitch and affirms the accuracy of the department's reporting.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- The New York Times
Is the Pentagon's public count of U.S. military deaths in the Iran war complete?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full caseUnited States Department of Defense
“The Pentagon declined to address questions about the accounting discrepancy.”Read statement
“This should surprise no one. They’re not being truthful about so many things. Congress should return to DC immediately and question Hegseth. There’s nothing more important than getting the truth about America’s dead sons and daughters.”Read statement
“The Pentagon continues to lie about the number of troops and contractors that have died as a result of the Iran War.”Read statement