The Inquirer editorial board says Krasner must decide whether he can govern under "the giant cloud he has created"
Editorial board of The Philadelphia Inquirer, in an unsigned institutional editorial
“Then Krasner needs to look in the mirror and determine if he can continue to run the district attorney's office under the giant cloud he has created.”
Source and context
Original text
About this source
The editorial board of the city's largest newspaper responding to Judge Diamond's findings. It quotes the judge's conclusion that "potential wrongdoing abounds" and situates the ruling within what it describes as a pattern in the office's post-conviction work, noting that one supervisor was disbarred and another suspended for repeatedly lying in federal court. It stops short of calling for Krasner's resignation, instead asking whether he can regain the trust of the public and of prosecutors in his own office.
Before the quotation
Judge Paul Diamond had disqualified Krasner and Matthew Stiegler from the Dennis Johnson habeas case on September 15 and referred them and the District Attorney's Office to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Krasner said he would appeal.
After the quotation
The editorial noted that one supervisor in the office had been disbarred and another suspended for repeatedly lying in federal court. No elected Democrats had publicly defended Krasner at the time of publication.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Did Larry Krasner Pressure Staff to Mislead a Federal Judge About a Murder-Conviction Appeal?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case's fixed reference point is whether Krasner pressured subordinate prosecutors to present a false account to a federal judge. The board attributes the resulting crisis to Krasner himself, describing it as a cloud "he has created," and questions his fitness to continue, which is criticism of the conduct under scrutiny. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because the editorial is framed as a series of questions and expressly declines to demand resignation. That loses because declining to prescribe a remedy is not the same as withholding an evaluation; the possessive attribution of the cloud to Krasner states the board's judgment of responsibility.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Larry Krasner
Did Larry Krasner Pressure Staff to Mislead a Federal Judge About a Murder-Conviction Appeal?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full caseBroad + Liberty
“If even half of it is true, it is misconduct worthy of disbarment and removal from office.”Read statement
“For a man who ran on the slogan "F around and find out," Larry Krasner may soon find out.”Read statement
“This is unfortunately a continuation of the right's assault on DA Krasner and the policies that he's implemented. This is a judge using an internal conflict in the office to further the objective of removing Krasner from office.”Read statement