The Inquirer editorial board says Krasner must decide whether he can govern under "the giant cloud he has created"
The Philadelphia InquirerEditorial board of The Philadelphia Inquirer, in an unsigned institutional editorial
The Philadelphia Inquirer's editorial board responded to Judge Diamond's findings by asking whether Larry Krasner should still lead the District Attorney's Office. It quoted the judge's conclusion that "potential wrongdoing abounds," placed the ruling in what it called a pattern in the office's post-conviction work, and said Krasner must determine whether he can continue to run the office under the cloud he had created. It did not call for his resignation.
“Then Krasner needs to look in the mirror and determine if he can continue to run the district attorney's office under the giant cloud he has created.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Did Larry Krasner Pressure Staff to Mislead a Federal Judge About a Murder-Conviction Appeal?
A federal judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner and Matthew Stiegler, chief of his office's Conviction Integrity Unit, may have pressured subordinate prosecutors to blame a departed colleague and present a false account to the court about an internal dispute over a 2022 concession in a habeas corpus case, and referred Krasner, Stiegler, and the District Attorney's Office to the U.S. Attorney's Office for investigation. Krasner disputes the judge's findings and says he will appeal.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
The editorial board of the city's largest newspaper responding to Judge Diamond's findings. It quotes the judge's conclusion that "potential wrongdoing abounds" and situates the ruling within what it describes as a pattern in the office's post-conviction work, noting that one supervisor was disbarred and another suspended for repeatedly lying in federal court. It stops short of calling for Krasner's resignation, instead asking whether he can regain the trust of the public and of prosecutors in his own office.
Before the quotation
Judge Paul Diamond had disqualified Krasner and Matthew Stiegler from the Dennis Johnson habeas case on September 15 and referred them and the District Attorney's Office to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Krasner said he would appeal.
After the quotation
The editorial noted that one supervisor in the office had been disbarred and another suspended for repeatedly lying in federal court. No elected Democrats had publicly defended Krasner at the time of publication.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The board attributes the resulting crisis to Krasner himself, describing it as a cloud "he has created," and questions his fitness to continue, which is criticism of the conduct under scrutiny. The closest competing label is “Mixed or conditional”, because the editorial is framed as a series of questions and expressly declines to demand resignation. That loses because declining to prescribe a remedy is not the same as withholding an evaluation; the possessive attribution of the cloud to Krasner states the board's judgment of responsibility.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Larry Krasner
More from this case
Read the full casePreib urges scrutiny of prosecutors in Philadelphia and Chicago
“While the Chicago media refuses to address the blatant parallels between top prosecutors in Philly and Chicago, federal investigators should not refuse to do so. Restoring the criminal justice system, in particular holding police killers accountable, is a central theme of the Trump administration. The feds must do their job not just in Philly, but Chicago as well.”Read statement
Krasner denies criminal and deliberate wrongdoing in WHYY interview
“Not only did we do nothing criminal, we did nothing that was deliberately wrong,”Read statement
Krasner tells the court he and his supervisors "acted with integrity"
“DA Krasner and his supervisory assistants acted with integrity in seeking to withdraw the erroneous brief, correct the errors, and change position to oppose a new trial”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- The Inquirer editorial board says Krasner must decide whether he can govern under "the giant cloud he has created"
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/1051-the-philadelphia-inquirer-s-editorial-board-responded-to
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "The Inquirer editorial board says Krasner must decide whether he can govern under "the giant cloud he has created"". First published: 2026-09-18. Last updated: 2026-09-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/1051-the-philadelphia-inquirer-s-editorial-board-responded-to