Healey calls for independent AI safety evaluations in the Mass Wins Act and "strong action" from Washington
Governor of Massachusetts, in an official press release and on her official X account
“AI has enormous potential to drive scientific discovery, strengthen key industries, improve public services, and create new opportunities for businesses and residents across Massachusetts. At the same time, the rapid pace of AI development raises serious concerns about safety, accountability, privacy, civil rights, the future of work, and public trust. We cannot allow this technology to move faster than our ability to put appropriate safeguards in place, and we can't let the responsibility for managing these risks rest with technology companies alone. We need strong action on both the state and federal levels.”
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Official press release from the Massachusetts governor's office, September 18, 2026, in which Healey calls for independent safety evaluations of the most powerful AI models and earlier reporting of serious safety incidents to be included in the Mass Wins economic development bill, then being negotiated by the Legislature. It builds on remarks she made earlier the same week and notes that California, New York and Illinois have already enacted comparable state frameworks. This is the fuller official record of the same message Healey posted to X the same day, which had no attached video.
Original post
About this source
Healey's own X post announcing the same call for AI safety provisions covered in the official Mass.gov press release the same day.
Before the quotation
The House had adjourned early the previous week for a seven-week recess without acting on AI legislation. Healey's recommendations built on remarks she made earlier the same week calling for stronger safeguards and independent oversight; Shapiro, Pritzker and Newsom had each made comparable calls citing their own states' AI laws.
After the quotation
The press release noted that California, New York and Illinois have already enacted state AI-safety frameworks. The Massachusetts Legislature's House and Senate had been negotiating the Mass Wins Act for more than a month at the time of Healey's letter.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case's fixed reference point is the proposition that Washington should impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI. Healey endorses it directly, pairing a concrete state legislative push (independent evaluations and incident reporting in the Mass Wins Act) with an explicit call for federal action, saying responsibility "can't rest with technology companies alone." That places her with the same week's cluster of state officials making this argument: Shapiro, Pritzker and Newsom. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, since she also emphasizes AI's benefits to innovation and the economy. That loses because acknowledging AI's potential upside alongside a call for safeguards is not a competing position on the case's reference point; DI's guidance treats a fair, brief acknowledgement as insufficient to dilute an otherwise clear conclusion, and her operative recommendation is unambiguously for stronger safeguards.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“I joined @RepYassAnsari and more than two dozen @HouseDemocrats in urging Donald Trump to take urgent action to address the serious risks posed by frontier AI.”Read statement
“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world... So the tech bros in the U.S. that say if we regulate AI, the Chinese going to win - that's a self-serving argument. That isn't true.”Read statement
“Today I'm signing an executive order to speed up a first in America AI safety policy that we have here in California. [...] It dramatically speeds up our new law, creating a framework for truly independent safety checks, independent verification organizations, as well as moving the timeline up for oversight of AI auditors up by a full year. [...] California will do what it can, but this nation needs to get in the game. Washington DC needs to do its job. Remarkably, they left for a summer break. Mike Johnson should return from vacation and follow California's lead by passing national legislation. Get it done. That's what leadership requires, setting a comprehensive safety framework as a floor. [...] And if Congress, again, won't act, California will.”Read statement