Regulator says it can force Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners to sell if it finds them unfit; Carragher says they must sell up, and Burnham says he would be concerned to lose them

After the sham-sponsorship findings, Jamie Carragher said Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners must sell up, while Prime Minister Andy Burnham said he would be concerned to lose them. Regulator chair David Kogan says it can force a sale but will await the appeal.

Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, in a white kandura and headdress, smiles as he shakes hands with Austrian Vice-Chancellor Michael Spindelegger in a meeting room in Abu Dhabi.
Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, whose companies have owned Manchester City since 2008, meets Austrian Vice-Chancellor Michael Spindelegger in Abu Dhabi on February 13, 2013.

Case period:

Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated

Manchester City FCIndependent Football Regulator

Overview

On September 29, 2026, the Premier League published an independent commission's finding that Manchester City arranged sponsorship contracts it described as shams to disguise funding from its owner between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons. City denies wrongdoing and has appealed. The findings opened a second argument, over whether the club's Abu Dhabi owners, led by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, should keep the club if the findings stand. Jamie Carragher wrote that the owners must sell up, and Gary Neville said it was hard to see how they could pass the owners' and directors' test. Prime Minister Andy Burnham said he would be really concerned to lose them. The Independent Football Regulator, which can judge whether owners are suitable, says it can require an owner to step away but will not make a judgement while the appeal is pending.

Read the full background

Whether City used sham sponsorships, and the club's denial, are recorded in a separate case on the commission's findings. This case follows the argument over the club's owners. Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan has owned Manchester City since 2008 through his investment companies; the commission found that his Abu Dhabi United Group funded most of the disputed sponsorship fees.

The regulator's owners' test

The Independent Football Regulator, set up by the government in 2025, said on September 30 (opens in a new tab) that it can assess the suitability of owners, directors and executives and would use those powers where there is clear evidence of wrongdoing by individuals, taking account of findings made by the leagues. It said it would await further developments while the proceedings continued. On October 13 its chair, David Kogan, said (opens in a new tab) that a verdict that had been through the appeal process would be taken into account when looking at the club's owners, directors and senior executives. A week later he told The Rest Is Football podcast (opens in a new tab) that the regulator can ask an owner to step away from a club and that an owner could not refuse. City AM reports (opens in a new tab) that a disqualified owner would be given a deadline to sell, after which a third party would take over the sale.

The Prime Minister and the government

On September 30 Prime Minister Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester until June, told the BBC (opens in a new tab) he would be really concerned to lose City's owners. Conservative shadow minister Louie French and Green Party deputy leader Mothin Ali (opens in a new tab) criticized the remark. The next day a Downing Street spokesperson said (opens in a new tab) there could not be any suggestion that anyone is above the rules and that, wherever wrongdoing is established, those responsible should face the appropriate consequences. Kogan said on October 13 (opens in a new tab) that any political interference in the regulator's work would lead him to resign and that it had come under no political pressure. Burnham said he would publish (opens in a new tab) details of his dealings with the club's owners from his time as mayor.

The owners' position

In June, before the findings were published, club chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak said (opens in a new tab) there was no intention to sell. City AM reports (opens in a new tab) that City Football Group, the club's parent company, allotted new shares worth about 100 million pounds on October 14, and that a group spokesperson confirmed they were bought by Newton Investment and Development, Sheikh Mansour's company. ITV News reported (opens in a new tab) that City's appeal was expected to rest on evidence that the Abu Dhabi government, not Sheikh Mansour, provided sponsorship funding. As of November 15, 2026, we could not locate a public statement from Sheikh Mansour, or from the club since the findings were published, on whether the owner would sell.

What is still open

As of November 15, 2026, the appeal had not been decided and no sanction had been set. Kogan said (opens in a new tab) the regulator would decide whether to open its own investigation only after the outstanding questions in the case are answered.

People in this case

Timeline

6 timeline entries on this page. Dates: September 29, 2026 to October 14, 2026

  1. September 2026

    1. Premier League publishes the commission's findings against Manchester City

      Source release

      The league publishes an independent commission's decision finding that City arranged sham sponsorship contracts between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons, with the owner funding most of the fees. City says it is innocent and will pursue an appeal.

      [01]Premier League

      Source excerpt

      The core decision establishes the facts of what happened at Manchester City during this period. It details how the club systematically broke Premier League Rules for nearly a decade.

      The Premier League's statement of September 29, 2026 announcing the commission's findings, with a link to the redacted core decision. It summarizes the findings, gives a quotation from chief executive Richard Masters, says sanction will be decided at a separate private hearing and says City has until Friday, October 2 to appeal. The page shows a date but no time.

      Premier League Statement: Manchester City FC · Premier LeagueStatement, quotation from Richard Masters and Notes to Editors
      [02]The Standard

      The Standard's report on City's response, printing the club's statement in full. It matches the BBC Sport copy of the statement.

      Man City claim innocence and confirm plan to appeal 'unsafe' guilty verdict · The StandardCity's statement, as printed in the article
    2. Independent Football Regulator says it can assess the suitability of owners and will await developments

      Reaction

      The regulator says the decision raises serious issues and that it will use its powers to assess owners, directors and executives where there is clear evidence of wrongdoing by individuals, but will await further developments while the proceedings continue.

      [03]Independent Football Regulator

      Source excerpt

      The independent commission’s decision raises serious issues.

      The regulator's own statement on its website, dated September 30, 2026 and attributed to its chair, David Kogan.

      IFR Statement - Manchester City · Independent Football RegulatorWhole statement, attributed to IFR Chair David Kogan
  2. October 2026

    1. Downing Street says no one is above the rules after Burnham's comments on City's owners

      Reaction

      A Downing Street spokesperson says the initial judgment is serious, that the independent process must run its course, and that wherever wrongdoing is established those responsible should face the appropriate consequences.

      [04]'Wrongdoing' at Manchester City should lead to 'appropriate consequences', says Downing Street

      ITV News report on the Downing Street spokesperson's statement after Andy Burnham's comments about City's owners, with the full statement from Conservative shadow minister Louie French.

      'Wrongdoing' at Manchester City should lead to 'appropriate consequences', says Downing StreetParagraphs quoting the Downing Street spokesperson, Burnham and Louie French
    2. Manchester City lodges its appeal against the commission's decision

      Incident

      City says it lodged a comprehensive appeal at 7 p.m. on October 1, and the Premier League confirms the next day that the club has appealed. The Appeal Board hearing is private.

      [05]Man City lodge appeal: Premier League club contest guilty verdict of independent commission (Sky Sports, October 2, 2026)

      Source excerpt

      Manchester City Football Club can confirm that at 7pm on Thursday 1st October 2026 the club lodged its comprehensive appeal against the opinion of the Premier League Commission, in relation to the Premier League disciplinary matter.

      Sky Sports' report reproduces Manchester City's October 2 statement confirming its appeal, in which the club says the decision contains clear material errors of law, principle and fact, is unsafe, and that it is innocent. The report also notes that the appeal timeline under the league's rules runs about 12 weeks from filing.

      [06]Premier League

      Source excerpt

      Manchester City FC has appealed the decision of an independent Commission regarding breaches of Premier League rules. The club lodged the appeal to the Chair of the Judicial Panel.

      The Premier League's statement confirming that Manchester City appealed the independent commission's decision. It says the Appeal Board hearing will remain private and confidential until publication of the outcome is permitted, and sets out how Appeal Boards are appointed and what they may decide.

    3. Regulator chair David Kogan says he would resign over any political interference

      Reaction

      Speaking in Manchester, Kogan says the regulator has come under no political pressure and that any interference would lead him to resign. He says a verdict that has been through the appeal process would be taken into account when looking at the club's owners, directors and senior executives.

      [07]Associated Press

      Associated Press report, carried by News4JAX, on Kogan's remarks in Manchester at the launch of the regulator's State of the Game report.

      English soccer's regulator insists there will be no political pressure in Man City case · Associated PressParagraphs quoting Kogan on political interference and on the appeal
    4. Sheikh Mansour's company buys about 100 million pounds of new City Football Group shares

      Incident

      City Football Group, Manchester City's parent company, allots new shares raising about 100 million pounds. A group spokesperson tells City AM that Newton Investment and Development, Sheikh Mansour's company, bought them.

      [08]Sheikh Mansour doubles down on Manchester City with £100m injection despite legal row

      City AM report on new City Football Group shares allotted on October 14, 2026 and bought by Sheikh Mansour's company, confirmed by a group spokesperson.

Claims

Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.

What's disputed

Disputed claim

Gary Neville

Gary Neville said in a Sky Sports article published on October 3, 2026 that "It's hard to see how the Man City owners can comply with the owners' and directors' test in this country if the verdict remains" and that the only appropriate punishment is "to apply the owners' and directors' test, firstly".

What is disputed

Prime Minister Andy Burnham said he would be really concerned to lose the owners, and the club denies wrongdoing and has appealed. The regulator says it will not judge the owners while the questions in the case remain open.

Sources (1)

Response record

Responses

Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.

7 responses. First 6 shown initially. Newest first.

  1. David KoganChair of the Independent Football Regulator, on The Rest Is Football podcast

    Before this statement

    GB News says Kogan explained it was too early to discuss any action by the regulator. City had appealed against the commission's decision and continues to deny wrongdoing.

    "I am not going to get pushed into making any judgement on this until we've seen all of those questions being answered, and then we will have to decide whether we're going to mount our own investigation and come to a conclusion on that and what we're going to do. And pre-empting that would be a colossal mistake. ... We have the power to ask an owner to step away from a club if we believe that they run a club in a way that is neither fit, fair or done with propriety"
    Explicitly stayed out

    Responding to: Gary Neville said in a Sky Sports article published on October 3, 2026 that "It's hard to see how the Man City owners can comply with the owners' and directors' test in this country if the verdict remains" and that the only appropriate punishment is "to apply the owners' and directors' test, firstly".

    Full statement and sources

    On The Rest Is Football podcast, the regulator's chair said he would not be pushed into any judgement until the questions in the case are answered, calling a prejudgement a colossal mistake. He said the regulator has the power to ask an owner to step away from a club it believes is not run fitly, fairly or with propriety.

    After the statement

    Asked whether an owner could refuse to sell, Kogan said they could not. He said the regulator would judge the individuals involved against the tests for owners, senior directors and executives, rather than take action against the club as the Premier League can.

    Why this label?

    Kogan describes the regulator's power to remove an owner but refuses to make any judgement on City's owners until the questions in the case are answered. We labeled it Explicitly stayed out.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  2. Lisa NandyCulture Secretary (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport), in a talkSPORT interview

    Before this statement

    Sports Illustrated reported the interview on October 15, 2026. It says Nandy told talkSPORT that if the allegations are upheld at appeal, the regulator can investigate the ownership and, at its most extreme, compel the owners if it believes they are not fit to run the club.

    "I want to be crystal clear that, whilst we are really grateful to investors who come from all over the world to invest in our clubs and help to ensure their viability and their success, they are custodians, both of their clubs and of the game ... They have a responsibility to play by the rules and uphold the rules. ... We’re not there yet. It's absolutely right that Manchester City get the right to defend themselves and they do strongly refute the allegations. But in the event that they do not believe that a club is in safe hands, we’ve fought tooth and nail to give the Independent Regulator the power."
    Mixed or conditional

    Case context: Regulator says it can force Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners to sell if it finds them unfit; Carragher says they must sell up, and Burnham says he would be concerned to lose them

    Full statement and sources

    Speaking to talkSPORT, Nandy said investors who own clubs are custodians with a responsibility to uphold the rules, and that the government gave the regulator the power to act if a club is not in safe hands. She said City has the right to defend itself and that the matter has not reached that point.

    After the statement

    Sports Illustrated says the government will not intervene in the process. It also quotes regulator chair David Kogan telling Times Radio that the regulator has had no political interference and will look closely at the evidence once the appeal has been heard.

    U.K. Government Satisfied With 'Most Extreme' Outcome in Man City CaseParagraphs quoting Lisa Nandy's talkSPORT interview and David Kogan's Times Radio interview

    Why this label?

    Nandy says owners must uphold the rules and the regulator can act if a club is not in safe hands, but she makes any action depend on the appeal and says City is entitled to defend itself. We labeled it Mixed or conditional.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  3. Gary NevilleSky Sports pundit and Salford City co-owner, in a Sky Sports article

    Before this statement

    Sky Sports published the piece after City confirmed it had lodged an appeal against the commission's decision. Neville is a co-owner of Salford City in the English Football League.

    "It’s hard to see how the Man City owners can comply with the owners’ and directors’ test in this country if the verdict remains. The reality is, because of improper owners of clubs, there are a lot stricter rules in place. It’ll be difficult for the Man City owners to retain their status. Clubs are protected assets, community assets, because of the meaning of them to fans and people of a city, so owners have to comply with the rules and laws set out in the test. The only appropriate punishment is to apply the owners’ and directors’ test, firstly, and then to look at the achievements over the period and determine whether they should still stand."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Gary Neville said in a Sky Sports article published on October 3, 2026 that "It's hard to see how the Man City owners can comply with the owners' and directors' test in this country if the verdict remains" and that the only appropriate punishment is "to apply the owners' and directors' test, firstly".

    Full statement and sources

    Neville said it is hard to see how City's owners could comply with the owners' and directors' test if the verdict remains, and that applying that test, then reviewing the titles won in the period, is the only appropriate punishment.

    After the statement

    He went on to say that, if he were City, he would accept a fine or a points deduction, even of 60 points, because that would only damage the club for a moment in time. He also said the Premier League was being dragged through the mud.

    Man City owners cannot 'retain status' if guilty verdict stands after appeal, says Gary Neville · Sky SportsArticle text quoting Neville on the owners' and directors' test

    Why this label?

    Neville argues that the owners would struggle to keep their status if the verdict stands and that the owners' test, rather than fines or points, is the right punishment. That treats losing the club as the proper consequence, so we labeled it Condemned.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  4. Louie FrenchConservative shadow minister for culture, media and sport, in a statement reported by ITV News

    Before this statement

    French was responding to Burnham's comment to the BBC that he would be really concerned to see City's owners sell up. ITV News describes him as the Conservative shadow sport minister.

    "Andy Burnham’s intervention in support of Manchester City’s owners is frankly extraordinary. The club face unprecedented allegations and fans are horrified by what they are reading in the papers, yet Burnham is publicly backing the owners even as the investigation continues."
    Condemned

    Case context: Regulator says it can force Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners to sell if it finds them unfit; Carragher says they must sell up, and Burnham says he would be concerned to lose them

    Full statement and sources

    The Conservative shadow minister said Burnham's intervention in support of City's owners was frankly extraordinary while the club faced unprecedented allegations, and that Burnham was publicly backing the owners while the investigation continued.

    After the statement

    He went on to say fans would ask whether political pressure was being applied, that football must be governed independently, and that fans deserve confidence that no club or owner is above the rules. A Downing Street spokesperson later said there could not be any suggestion that anyone is above the rules.

    'Wrongdoing' at Manchester City should lead to 'appropriate consequences', says Downing StreetParagraphs quoting the Downing Street spokesperson, Burnham and Louie French

    Why this label?

    French criticizes the Prime Minister for publicly backing City's owners while the case continues and says no club or owner should be above the rules, which rejects political support for the owners keeping the club. We labeled it Condemned.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  5. Jamie CarragherSky Sports pundit and former Liverpool player, in his Daily Telegraph column

    Before this statement

    PA Media reported the column on October 1, 2026, as City prepared its appeal. PA says Carragher argued there could be no future for any executive implicated in the case, from majority owner Sheikh Mansour downwards.

    "The club can only heal and recover from the shame of their guilt once the custodians recognise they have failed in their duty and sell up."
    Condemned

    Responding to: Gary Neville said in a Sky Sports article published on October 3, 2026 that "It's hard to see how the Man City owners can comply with the owners' and directors' test in this country if the verdict remains" and that the only appropriate punishment is "to apply the owners' and directors' test, firstly".

    Full statement and sources

    In his Daily Telegraph column after the findings were published, Carragher wrote that the club can only heal and recover once its owners accept that they have failed in their duty and sell up.

    After the statement

    He went on to write that the position of all City executives involved is untenable and that fighting on would only prolong the agony of supporters. PA notes that his view contrasts with comments Prime Minister Andy Burnham made the day before.

    Why this label?

    Carragher writes that City can only recover once its owners accept they have failed in their duty and sell the club, a call for them to give it up. We labeled it Condemned.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

  6. Andy BurnhamPrime Minister of the United Kingdom, in an interview with the BBC's political editor

    Before this statement

    BBC political editor Chris Mason asked Burnham whether he was concerned that City's owners would now sell the club, the day after the commission's findings were published. Burnham was Mayor of Greater Manchester until June.

    "I would be really concerned to lose them. They've been such a huge partner in the building of modern Manchester and obviously the building of Manchester City into the global force that it is."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Regulator says it can force Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners to sell if it finds them unfit; Carragher says they must sell up, and Burnham says he would be concerned to lose them

    Full statement and sources

    Asked by the BBC whether he was concerned that City's owners would now sell the club, Burnham said he would be really concerned to lose them and called them a huge partner in building modern Manchester.

    After the statement

    He thanked the City Football Group and the wider ownership for investing in the city as well as the club, said it would be wrong for him to intervene, and said it is frustrating when people rush to judgement. He compared the case with Everton's, which he said was not handled fairly.

    Andy Burnham 'really concerned' if Man City owners sell up after rule breaches (BBC News) · BBCParagraphs quoting Burnham on Everton and on leaping to one side

    Why this label?

    Burnham says he would not want to lose City's owners and praises what they have built in the club and the city, which backs their keeping the club. We labeled it Defended or excused, though he also said it would be wrong for him to intervene.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

View all 7 responsesShow fewer responses
  1. Khaldoon Al MubarakChairman of Manchester City, in the club's annual end-of-season interview

    Before this statement

    The club's website published the chairman's annual end-of-season interview on June 5, 2026. It notes that Sheikh Mansour has owned City since 2008.

    "There’s no intention to sell There’s only intention to keep growing this because the view here is this will only grow and this is a beautiful business to own. It’s football and it’s entertainment. And in the world we’re in today, while the world changes and people’s attention goes to different things, sport stays. And football within sports is the pinnacle. And Manchester City and this Group within the football world is a pinnacle. And these sorts of jewels, you don’t sell."
    Defended or excused

    Case context: Regulator says it can force Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners to sell if it finds them unfit; Carragher says they must sell up, and Burnham says he would be concerned to lose them

    Full statement and sources

    In the club's end-of-season interview in June 2026, months before the findings were published, the chairman said there was no intention to sell, only to keep growing the business, and that jewels like Manchester City and its group are not sold.

    After the statement

    He went on to describe the club's development around the Etihad Stadium and said that in 18 years the owners had not taken a pound of profit outside the club.

    Chairman: Sheikh Mansour has no intention of selling this business · Manchester City FCOpening section of the chairman's annual end-of-season interview

    Why this label?

    Khaldoon says the owner means to keep and grow the club and its group rather than sell, which backs the owner keeping Manchester City. He spoke before the findings were published. We labeled it Defended or excused.

    This label describes the statement's response within the context above.

Sources

(15)

Official statement

IFR Statement - Manchester City

IFR Statement - Manchester City (opens in a new tab) · Independent Football RegulatorWhole statement, attributed to IFR Chair David Kogan
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Whole statement, attributed to IFR Chair David Kogan

Excerpt

"The independent commission’s decision raises serious issues."

About this source

The regulator's own statement on its website, dated September 30, 2026 and attributed to its chair, David Kogan.

Author
Independent Football Regulator
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Sheikh Mansour doubles down on Manchester City with £100m injection despite legal row

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs on the share issue

About this source

City AM report on new City Football Group shares allotted on October 14, 2026 and bought by Sheikh Mansour's company, confirmed by a group spokesperson.

Author
Frank Dalleres, City AM
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

English soccer's regulator insists there will be no political pressure in Man City case

English soccer's regulator insists there will be no political pressure in Man City case (opens in a new tab) · Associated PressParagraphs quoting Kogan on political interference and on the appeal
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Kogan on political interference and on the appeal

About this source

Associated Press report, carried by News4JAX, on Kogan's remarks in Manchester at the launch of the regulator's State of the Game report.

Author
James Robson, Associated Press
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

'Wrongdoing' at Manchester City should lead to 'appropriate consequences', says Downing Street

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting the Downing Street spokesperson, Burnham and Louie French

About this source

ITV News report on the Downing Street spokesperson's statement after Andy Burnham's comments about City's owners, with the full statement from Conservative shadow minister Louie French.

Author
ITV News Granada
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

U.K. Government Satisfied With 'Most Extreme' Outcome in Man City Case

U.K. Government Satisfied With 'Most Extreme' Outcome in Man City Case (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs quoting Lisa Nandy's talkSPORT interview and David Kogan's Times Radio interview
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Lisa Nandy's talkSPORT interview and David Kogan's Times Radio interview

About this source

Sports Illustrated article quoting Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy's talkSPORT interview on club owners and the regulator's powers, and Kogan's Times Radio interview on political interference.

Author
Jamie Spencer, Sports Illustrated
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Man City owners could be forced to sell if wrongdoing is upheld, regulator chief says (AFP)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs quoting Kogan

About this source

AFP report, carried by Malay Mail, quoting Kogan's remarks on The Rest Is Football podcast that the regulator can ask an owner to step away from a club.

Author
Agence France-Presse, published by Malay Mail
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Man City: Independent Football Regulator confirms it has 'absolute power' to force owners to sell the club

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Kogan's interview on The Rest Is Football podcast

About this source

GB News report quoting David Kogan, chair of the Independent Football Regulator, on The Rest Is Football podcast about the regulator's powers over club owners and the Manchester City case.

Author
GB News
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Interview

Chairman: Sheikh Mansour has no intention of selling this business

Chairman: Sheikh Mansour has no intention of selling this business (opens in a new tab) · Manchester City FCOpening section of the chairman's annual end-of-season interview
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening section of the chairman's annual end-of-season interview

About this source

Article on Manchester City's website from Khaldoon Al Mubarak's annual end-of-season interview, published in June 2026, before the commission's findings, with his remarks on whether the owner would sell.

Author
Jack Mumford, Manchester City
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Man City owners cannot 'retain status' if guilty verdict stands after appeal, says Gary Neville

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Article text quoting Neville on the owners' and directors' test

About this source

Sky Sports article, published the day after City confirmed its appeal, quoting Gary Neville on whether the club's owners could pass the owners' and directors' test if the verdict stands.

Author
Gary Neville, Sky Sports
Published
Accessed

Reporting

Man City sale is only way to 'heal from shame of their guilt', says Jamie Carragher (PA Media)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs, quoting Carragher's Daily Telegraph column

About this source

PA Media report, carried by The Irish News, on Jamie Carragher's Daily Telegraph column arguing that Manchester City's owners must sell the club after the commission's findings.

Author
PA Media, published by The Irish News
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Man City lodge appeal: Premier League club contest guilty verdict of independent commission (Sky Sports, October 2, 2026)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Quoted Manchester City statement, paragraphs 5-8

Excerpt

"Manchester City Football Club can confirm that at 7pm on Thursday 1st October 2026 the club lodged its comprehensive appeal against the opinion of the Premier League Commission, in relation to the Premier League disciplinary matter."

About this source

Sky Sports' report reproduces Manchester City's October 2 statement confirming its appeal, in which the club says the decision contains clear material errors of law, principle and fact, is unsafe, and that it is innocent. The report also notes that the appeal timeline under the league's rules runs about 12 weeks from filing.

Author
Sky Sports
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Premier League Statement: Manchester City FC appeal decision of independent Commission (Premier League, October 2, 2026)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Opening paragraphs

Excerpt

"Manchester City FC has appealed the decision of an independent Commission regarding breaches of Premier League rules. The club lodged the appeal to the Chair of the Judicial Panel."

About this source

The Premier League's statement confirming that Manchester City appealed the independent commission's decision. It says the Appeal Board hearing will remain private and confidential until publication of the outcome is permitted, and sets out how Appeal Boards are appointed and what they may decide.

Author
Premier League
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Andy Burnham 'really concerned' if Man City owners sell up after rule breaches (BBC News)

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Paragraphs quoting Burnham on Everton and on leaping to one side

About this source

BBC News' article on the interview, recorded at Everton's stadium. It quotes Burnham comparing City's position with Everton's 2023 case and saying it would be wrong of him to leap to one side.

Author
Ewan Somerville and Henry Zeffman (BBC News)
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Man City claim innocence and confirm plan to appeal 'unsafe' guilty verdict

Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: City's statement, as printed in the article

About this source

The Standard's report on City's response, printing the club's statement in full. It matches the BBC Sport copy of the statement.

Author
Alex Young, The Standard
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Official statement

Premier League Statement: Manchester City FC

Premier League Statement: Manchester City FC (opens in a new tab) · Premier LeagueStatement, quotation from Richard Masters and Notes to Editors
Read source (opens in a new tab)

Relevant passage: Statement, quotation from Richard Masters and Notes to Editors

Excerpt

"The core decision establishes the facts of what happened at Manchester City during this period. It details how the club systematically broke Premier League Rules for nearly a decade."

About this source

The Premier League's statement of September 29, 2026 announcing the commission's findings, with a link to the redacted core decision. It summarizes the findings, gives a quotation from chief executive Richard Masters, says sanction will be decided at a separate private hearing and says City has until Friday, October 2 to appeal. The page shows a date but no time.

Author
Premier League
Published
Accessed
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

14 updates added in the last 7 days.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The newsletter

Follow disputes like this one.

New cases and significant updates to the record, in your inbox. Free.

You’ll confirm your subscription on Substack.

Share or embed this case

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Regulator says it can force Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners to sell if it finds them unfit; Carragher says they must sell up, and Burnham says he would be concerned to lose them
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/cases/manchester-city-abu-dhabi-owners-forced-sale-regulator

The Dispute Index. "Regulator says it can force Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners to sell if it finds them unfit; Carragher says they must sell up, and Burnham says he would be concerned to lose them". First published: 2026-11-15. Last updated: 2026-11-15. https://disputeindex.com/cases/manchester-city-abu-dhabi-owners-forced-sale-regulator