Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham says he is open to calls for a formal British state apology for the transatlantic slave trade but rules out financial reparations. Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage oppose an apology, and CARICOM says an apology without repair is incomplete.
Case period:
Published by The Dispute Index editorial teamPublished Updated
Overview
Burnham's article appeared days before the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Antigua and Barbuda, where King Charles III was due to give the opening address on November 3 at the end of a tour of the Caribbean. The British government has never formally apologised for the slave trade or paid reparations, and earlier UK governments also ruled out reparations. CARICOM's Ten-Point Plan for Reparatory Justice lists a full formal apology alongside measures that include public health, education, debt cancellation and monetary compensation.
On November 2, Buckingham Palace said the King's role in the Commonwealth is about "inspiring and convening, rather than policy making". Burnham's spokesperson said the same day that a formal apology should be "discussed properly with the countries and communities most affected".
People in this case
Andy BurnhamDirectly involved
Kemi BadenochDirectly involved
Nigel FarageDirectly involved
Philip J. PierreDirectly involved
Timeline
7 timeline entries on this page. Dates: October 30, 2026 to November 2, 2026
October 2026
Burnham says he is open to a formal apology and rules out reparations
Claim
In a Guardian article, Prime Minister Andy Burnham expresses his sorrow and regret for the suffering caused by the transatlantic slave trade, offers a structured dialogue with those affected and says he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state. He writes that financial reparations are not the right answer and announces a drive on debt for the poorest countries.
[01]The Guardian
Opinion article by UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham, published in the Guardian on October 30, 2026, ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Antigua and Barbuda. He offers a structured dialogue on the transatlantic slave trade, says he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state, rejects financial reparations and announces a drive on debt for the poorest countries.
British people can't be made to pay for the wrongs of slavery - but we must confront our complicated history · The GuardianFull articleBadenoch, Braverman and Farage oppose a formal apology
Reaction
Reform UK MP Suella Braverman calls a formal apology "dangerous virtue-signalling", Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch says there is no need to apologise again, and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage says "I say no. I say enough."
[02]Suella Braverman calls a formal slavery apology "dangerous virtue-signalling"
Braverman quote-posts a Reuters post reporting that Burnham is open to a formal apology for slavery but rules out reparations.
Suella Braverman calls a formal slavery apology "dangerous virtue-signalling"Post 2116508465325617237[03]Kemi Badenoch on a formal apology and reparations
Long post by the Conservative leader responding to Burnham's Guardian article, on a formal apology, reparations and debt relief.
Kemi Badenoch on a formal apology and reparationsPost 2116517088869192115[04]Nigel Farage responds to Burnham's openness to a formal apology
The Reform UK leader's post quotes Burnham's Guardian article and sets out why he opposes a formal apology.
Nigel Farage responds to Burnham's openness to a formal apologyPost 2116593969396326808CARICOM's chair welcomes the offer of dialogue and rejects the position on reparations
Reaction
Saint Lucia Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre, chair of the Caribbean Community, says no British prime minister has gone this far before and that CARICOM is ready to engage, but that an apology without repair is incomplete and debt relief cannot replace reparatory justice.
[05]Statement from the Chair of the Caribbean Community, Hon. Philip J. Pierre, Prime Minister of Saint Lucia: Reparatory Justice, 31 October 2026
Statement by CARICOM's chair responding to Burnham's Guardian article: it welcomes his openness to a formal apology and his offer of a structured dialogue, rejects his position on reparations and comments on the proposed debt initiative.
[06]Associated Press
Associated Press explainer of November 1, 2026 on Burnham's position, the history of Britain's role in the slave trade, and responses from CARICOM and Kemi Badenoch.
The UK's stance on its role in the slave trade is shifting, but reparations remain off the table · Associated PressFull articleBraverman and Kay Burley trade posts about Elmina Castle and the history of the trade
Reaction
After Burley replies to Braverman from Elmina Castle in Ghana, Braverman says Africans took part in the slave trade there. Burley responds on November 1 about women held in the castle's dungeons, and Braverman replies that Burley should "Educate yourself" and that slavery was "the norm many centuries ago".
[07]Suella Braverman's reply to Kay Burley on Elmina
Braverman quote-posts Burley's post about Elmina Castle.
Suella Braverman's reply to Kay Burley on ElminaPost 2116558460040905075[08]Kay Burley's second reply to Braverman
Burley quote-posts Braverman's post about African participation in the trade at Elmina.
Kay Burley's second reply to BravermanPost 2116768434079883434[09]Suella Braverman tells Kay Burley to "educate yourself"
Braverman quote-posts Burley's second reply.
Suella Braverman tells Kay Burley to "educate yourself"Post 2116826095773209074Zia Yusuf pledges to stop visas for nationals of countries demanding reparations
Reaction
Reform UK home affairs spokesman Zia Yusuf calls Burnham's consideration of an apology "insane" and says that instead of apologising, he would as Home Secretary stop issuing visas to nationals of any country that demands slavery reparations from Britain.
[10]Zia Yusuf says it is "insane" that Burnham is considering apologising for slavery
Yusuf's post on Burnham's openness to a formal apology, including his pledge on visas for nationals of countries that demand reparations.
Zia Yusuf says it is "insane" that Burnham is considering apologising for slaveryPost 2116615604346007997
November 2026
Healey defends the openness to an apology as Badenoch calls it a lever for cash
Reaction
Chancellor John Healey tells the BBC that the Prime Minister is open to a discussion about an apology but does not believe reparations are the right approach. Kemi Badenoch tells Sky News that an apology is "a lever to wedge open the door to ask for cash".
[11]The Guardian
Guardian report of November 1, 2026 on Badenoch's comments to broadcasters and on X, and on Chancellor John Healey's remarks on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
Britain should not issue apology over slave trade, says Kemi Badenoch · The GuardianBadenoch's comments and Healey on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg[12]The Independent
Independent report of November 1, 2026 on Badenoch's Sky News interview, including her description of the British Empire as "overall a force for good", and on Healey's BBC remarks.
Badenoch claims British empire was 'overall' a force for good: 'We have had enough of apologies' · The IndependentBadenoch on Sky News and Healey on the BBCDowning Street says sorrow and regret is distinct from a formal apology
Burnham's spokesperson says his expression of sorrow and regret is "distinct from a formal apology" and that an apology should be informed by the people and countries most affected. Buckingham Palace says the King's role in the Commonwealth is not policy making, and a Downing Street source tells The Independent that there will be no additional aid allocations on top of existing budgets.
[13]BBC
BBC report of November 2, 2026 on Buckingham Palace's statement about the King's role, the Prime Minister's spokesperson distinguishing Burnham's sorrow and regret from a formal apology, and Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband's remarks.
King's role is not policy making, says Palace in slavery apology row · BBCPalace statement, Prime Minister's spokesperson and Ed Miliband[14]The Independent
Independent report of November 2, 2026 with comments from Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy, and Downing Street and Foreign Office statements on reparations and aid.
Tory grandee blasts slave reparations as Burnham denies payout plans · The IndependentRibeiro-Addy and Downing Street comments
Claims
Claims separate what was said from what is contested. Follow each source for the original wording and context.
What's disputed
Disputed claim
Britain should not pay financial reparations for the transatlantic slave trade because British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs in which they played no personal part.
What is disputed
Burnham set out this position in his Guardian article of October 30, 2026. CARICOM's chair, Philip J. Pierre, replied that reparatory justice "has never been about individual guilt" and concerns the responsibility of states and institutions. Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy made a similar argument about the responsibility of the state. Conservative and Reform UK politicians agreed that Britain should not pay reparations.
Sources (3)
- British people can't be made to pay for the wrongs of slavery - but we must confront our complicated history · The GuardianFull article
- Tory grandee blasts slave reparations as Burnham denies payout plans · The IndependentRibeiro-Addy and Downing Street comments
Disputed claim
A formal British apology for the slave trade would be used as a lever to seek financial compensation from Britain.
What is disputed
Badenoch made the argument on Sky News on November 1, 2026, and Suella Braverman wrote on October 31 that a formal apology "could expose Britain to reparations". Chancellor John Healey said that considering a formal apology does not mean accepting financial liability for the slave trade. CARICOM said it would receive a formal apology from the British state "as a moment of historic importance" and also seeks reparations under its Ten-Point Plan.
Sources (3)
- Britain should not issue apology over slave trade, says Kemi Badenoch · The GuardianBadenoch's comments and Healey on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg
- Badenoch claims British empire was 'overall' a force for good: 'We have had enough of apologies' · The IndependentBadenoch on Sky News and Healey on the BBC
- Suella Braverman calls a formal slavery apology "dangerous virtue-signalling"Post 2116508465325617237
Response record
Responses
Choose one response filter, or select All responses to see the full record.
10 responses. First 6 shown initially. Newest first.
Ed MilibandForeign SecretaryBefore this statement
Miliband said on November 2 that the UK was "self-confident enough to have this conversation".
"The dialogue we're setting up will consider whether and how a formal apology could help acknowledge the history, help heal the division and support stronger relationships for the future"
Mixed or conditionalCase context: Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
Full statement and sources
Miliband says the UK is self-confident enough to have the conversation and that the planned dialogue will consider whether and how a formal apology could help acknowledge the history.
After the statement
The same day, Burnham's spokesperson said his expression of sorrow and regret was "distinct from a formal apology" and that an apology "of this significance should be informed by the people and countries most affected".
King's role is not policy making, says Palace in slavery apology row · BBCPalace statement, Prime Minister's spokesperson and Ed MilibandWhy this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Miliband, Burnham's Foreign Secretary, says the UK is "self-confident enough to have this conversation" and that the dialogue will consider whether and how a formal apology could help. He supports holding the dialogue but leaves open whether an apology will follow, so his support is conditional.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Bell Ribeiro-AddyLabour MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, speaking to The IndependentBefore this statement
Ribeiro-Addy told The Independent that the Prime Minister's attention to reparations, and his recognition that Britain must engage with international partners, "is welcome".
"He has said he is open to a formal state apology. But openness is not commitment. Until the government makes a full and unequivocal apology, that remains the obstacle to progress."
Mixed or conditionalResponding to: Britain should not pay financial reparations for the transatlantic slave trade because British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs in which they played no personal part.
Full statement and sources
Ribeiro-Addy welcomes Burnham's attention to reparations but says a full and unequivocal apology is still needed and that the British state bears responsibility for slavery.
After the statement
She said nobody is asking the average British person to take personal responsibility for enslavement, adding: "This is about the responsibility of the state".
Tory grandee blasts slave reparations as Burnham denies payout plans · The IndependentRibeiro-Addy and Downing Street commentsWhy this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Ribeiro-Addy welcomes the openness but says it falls short of a full apology and argues that the state is responsible for slavery, which disputes the reasoning behind ruling out reparations. Her response supports part of the position and challenges the rest.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
John HealeyChancellor of the Exchequer, speaking on the BBC's Sunday with Laura KuenssbergBefore this statement
The Guardian reports that Healey said it would be unfair for British people to be hit financially for reparations when they had "no role" in the slave trade.
"The prime minister has said, look, we are open to a discussion about an apology. He feels that that’s the right thing, particularly ahead of the Commonwealth leaders’ conference"
Defended or excusedResponding to: A formal British apology for the slave trade would be used as a lever to seek financial compensation from Britain.
Full statement and sources
Healey says Burnham is open to a discussion about an apology ahead of the Commonwealth summit, and that considering one does not mean accepting financial liability.
After the statement
He added that Burnham does not believe "reparations are the right approach" and that considering a formal apology does not mean accepting financial liability for things that happened hundreds of years ago.
Britain should not issue apology over slave trade, says Kemi Badenoch · The GuardianBadenoch's comments and Healey on Sunday with Laura KuenssbergBadenoch claims British empire was 'overall' a force for good: 'We have had enough of apologies' · The IndependentBadenoch on Sky News and Healey on the BBCWhy this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Healey, a member of Burnham's government, says the openness to discussing an apology is the right thing and repeats the rejection of reparations, so he defends the position under review.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Richard TiceDeputy leader of Reform UK and MP for Boston and SkegnessBefore this statement
Tice opens the post with "Seriously" and says "UK PLC is going bust", that debt is soaring, that real disposable income is falling and that the country faces blackouts and "ruinous electricity bills".
"Yet news dominated by absurd debate over slavery reparations & apologies Idiotic"
CondemnedCase context: Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
Full statement and sources
Tice sets the economy, debt and electricity bills against news that he says is dominated by an "absurd debate over slavery reparations & apologies", and calls it "Idiotic".
After the statement
This is the end of the post.
Richard Tice calls the debate over slavery reparations and apologies "absurd"Post 2116816821584372158Why this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Tice calls the debate over reparations and apologies "absurd" and "Idiotic", which rejects the discussion of an apology that Burnham opened.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Zia YusufReform UK home affairs spokesmanBefore this statement
These are the opening lines of the post.
"It’s insane that Burnham is considering apologising for slavery. Britain did MORE THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY to end it."
CondemnedCase context: Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
Full statement and sources
Yusuf says Britain did more than any other country to end slavery, and pledges that instead of apologising, Reform would stop issuing visas to nationals of countries that demand reparations.
After the statement
He cites the Slave Trade Act of 1807 and the West Africa Squadron, which he says "freed 150,000 slaves", and says that "instead of apologising, as Home Secretary I will stop issuing visas to nationals of any country demanding slavery reparations from Britain".
Zia Yusuf says it is "insane" that Burnham is considering apologising for slaveryPost 2116615604346007997Why this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Yusuf calls Burnham's consideration of an apology "insane" and proposes refusing visas instead of apologising, so he opposes the position under review.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Nigel FarageLeader of Reform UK and MP for ClactonDirectly involvedBefore this statement
Farage quotes Burnham's Guardian article and says an apology now "would be like someone in the year 2526 having to apologise for heinous acts conducted today". He calls the trade an awful part of global history but says Britain has already atoned through its role in abolition and the West Africa Squadron.
"Yet Burnham is still “open” to making humiliating public pronouncements on Britain’s behalf. I say no. I say enough."
CondemnedCase context: Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
Full statement and sources
Farage calls Burnham's openness to a formal apology ridiculous and says Britain has already atoned for its part in the slave trade.
After the statement
He says Britain is "no longer a forward-looking nation" and that it is time to put the British people first.
Nigel Farage responds to Burnham's openness to a formal apologyPost 2116593969396326808Why this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Farage rejects any formal apology and describes it as humiliating, so he opposes the position under review.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Show fewer responses
Philip J. PierrePrime Minister of Saint Lucia and Chair of the Caribbean CommunityDirectly involvedBefore this statement
Pierre says no British prime minister has gone this far before and that CARICOM is "ready to engage", but that it does not accept that reparations are "not the right answer" or that responsibility ends because people in Britain today played no personal part.
"An apology is an essential first step, and we would receive a formal apology from the British state as a moment of historic importance. But an apology without repair is incomplete."
Mixed or conditionalResponding to: Britain should not pay financial reparations for the transatlantic slave trade because British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs in which they played no personal part.
Full statement and sources
Pierre welcomes Burnham's openness to a formal apology and his offer of dialogue, but says CARICOM does not accept that reparations are not the right answer.
After the statement
The statement asks that every element of CARICOM's Ten-Point Plan for Reparatory Justice be part of the dialogue, says the UK debt initiative will be examined seriously, and says debt relief "cannot be offered as a substitute for reparatory justice".
Why this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Pierre welcomes the openness to a formal apology but rejects the ruling out of reparations, so his response supports one part of the position and opposes the other.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Kay BurleyBroadcaster and former Sky News presenterBefore this statement
Burley quote-posts Braverman's post of the same day, which calls a formal apology "dangerous virtue-signalling" that could expose Britain to reparations.
"Having just left Elmina Castle in Ghana, where enslaved Africans were imprisoned before being shipped across the Atlantic, I think Europeans should never tire of acknowledging the horrors of our shared history and asking forgiveness from our African friends. Britain played its own shameful part in that history."
Defended or excusedCase context: Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
Full statement and sources
Replying to Braverman after visiting Elmina Castle in Ghana, Burley says Europeans should never tire of acknowledging the horrors of the slave trade and asking forgiveness, and that Britain played its own shameful part.
After the statement
Braverman replied the same afternoon by quote-posting Burley and saying that Africans took part in the slave trade at Elmina.
Kay Burley replies to Braverman from Elmina CastlePost 2116521623557710119Suella Braverman calls a formal slavery apology "dangerous virtue-signalling"Post 2116508465325617237Suella Braverman's reply to Kay Burley on ElminaPost 2116558460040905075Why this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Burley answers Braverman's objection to a formal apology by saying Europeans should keep asking forgiveness and that Britain played its own shameful part. That supports the acknowledgment and apology Burnham is open to, so the label marks support for his position; it does not describe a view of the slave trade itself, which she calls a horror. She does not address reparations.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Kemi BadenochLeader of the Conservative PartyDirectly involvedBefore this statement
Earlier in the same post, Badenoch says slavery was an evil in which people from every continent and region took part, and asks whether Caribbean countries will seek the same apology from the descendants of African kingdoms, rulers and merchants who profited from the trade. She also says British taxpayers should not be held financially responsible.
"As Prime Minister, Andy Burnham should be Britain’s greatest defender. Instead, he is writing articles saying we need to confront our history (as if we haven't done enough of that) and considering another formal historical apology. Tony Blair already expressed Britain’s deep sorrow and regret for our role in the slave trade nearly twenty years ago. There is no need to do so again."
CondemnedCase context: Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
Full statement and sources
Badenoch says Burnham should be Britain's greatest defender instead of considering another formal apology, and cites Tony Blair's expression of sorrow and regret nearly twenty years ago.
After the statement
She calls the debate "another navel-gazing distraction" and says that if every Commonwealth summit becomes a forum for demands for cash, "we need to start asking if it is worth the effort".
Kemi Badenoch on a formal apology and reparationsPost 2116517088869192115Why this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Badenoch says there is no need to apologise again and criticises Burnham for considering it, so she rejects the apology he is open to.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Suella BravermanReform UK MP for Fareham and WaterloovilleBefore this statement
Braverman quote-posts a Reuters post reporting that Burnham is open to a formal apology for slavery but rules out reparations. She begins: "Slavery was abhorrent. Fact."
"But to issue a formal apology today is dangerous virtue-signalling that could expose Britain to reparations costing us millions or even billions of pounds. This is very much how the Chagos disaster started under the Tories."
CondemnedResponding to: A formal British apology for the slave trade would be used as a lever to seek financial compensation from Britain.
Full statement and sources
Braverman says a formal apology could expose Britain to reparations costing millions or billions of pounds, and likens it to how what she calls the Chagos disaster began under the Conservatives.
After the statement
She says people living in Britain today should not pay for wrongs of centuries ago, points to Britain's role in ending slavery and what she describes as benefits of the British Empire, and says Burnham should "stand up for 21st century Brits".
Suella Braverman calls a formal slavery apology "dangerous virtue-signalling"Post 2116508465325617237Why this label?
The reference point is Andy Burnham's position, set out on October 30, 2026, that he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state for the transatlantic slave trade while ruling out financial reparations. Braverman says issuing a formal apology would be dangerous because it could lead to reparations, so she opposes the apology Burnham is open to.
This label describes the statement's response within the context above.
Sources
(16)
Original text
British people can't be made to pay for the wrongs of slavery - but we must confront our complicated history
Relevant passage: Full article
About this source
Opinion article by UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham, published in the Guardian on October 30, 2026, ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Antigua and Barbuda. He offers a structured dialogue on the transatlantic slave trade, says he is open to calls for a formal apology on behalf of the British state, rejects financial reparations and announces a drive on debt for the poorest countries.
- Author
- Andy Burnham
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Richard Tice calls the debate over slavery reparations and apologies "absurd"
About this source
Tice's post contrasting the news coverage of slavery reparations and apologies with the economy and energy bills.
- Author
- Richard Tice
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Zia Yusuf says it is "insane" that Burnham is considering apologising for slavery
About this source
Yusuf's post on Burnham's openness to a formal apology, including his pledge on visas for nationals of countries that demand reparations.
- Author
- Zia Yusuf
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Suella Braverman tells Kay Burley to "educate yourself"
About this source
Braverman quote-posts Burley's second reply.
- Author
- Suella Braverman
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Kay Burley's second reply to Braverman
About this source
Burley quote-posts Braverman's post about African participation in the trade at Elmina.
- Author
- Kay Burley
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Suella Braverman's reply to Kay Burley on Elmina
About this source
Braverman quote-posts Burley's post about Elmina Castle.
- Author
- Suella Braverman
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
The UK's stance on its role in the slave trade is shifting, but reparations remain off the table
Relevant passage: Full article
About this source
Associated Press explainer of November 1, 2026 on Burnham's position, the history of Britain's role in the slave trade, and responses from CARICOM and Kemi Badenoch.
- Author
- Sylvia Hui, Associated Press
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Tory grandee blasts slave reparations as Burnham denies payout plans
Relevant passage: Ribeiro-Addy and Downing Street comments
About this source
Independent report of November 2, 2026 with comments from Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy, and Downing Street and Foreign Office statements on reparations and aid.
- Author
- David Maddox
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
King's role is not policy making, says Palace in slavery apology row
Relevant passage: Palace statement, Prime Minister's spokesperson and Ed Miliband
About this source
BBC report of November 2, 2026 on Buckingham Palace's statement about the King's role, the Prime Minister's spokesperson distinguishing Burnham's sorrow and regret from a formal apology, and Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband's remarks.
- Author
- Sean Coughlan and Freya Scott-Turner
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Badenoch claims British empire was 'overall' a force for good: 'We have had enough of apologies'
Relevant passage: Badenoch on Sky News and Healey on the BBC
About this source
Independent report of November 1, 2026 on Badenoch's Sky News interview, including her description of the British Empire as "overall a force for good", and on Healey's BBC remarks.
- Author
- Athena Stavrou
- Published
- Accessed
Reporting
Britain should not issue apology over slave trade, says Kemi Badenoch
Relevant passage: Badenoch's comments and Healey on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg
About this source
Guardian report of November 1, 2026 on Badenoch's comments to broadcasters and on X, and on Chancellor John Healey's remarks on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
- Author
- Jessica Elgot
- Published
- Accessed
Official statement
Statement from the Chair of the Caribbean Community, Hon. Philip J. Pierre, Prime Minister of Saint Lucia: Reparatory Justice, 31 October 2026
Relevant passage: Full statement
About this source
Statement by CARICOM's chair responding to Burnham's Guardian article: it welcomes his openness to a formal apology and his offer of a structured dialogue, rejects his position on reparations and comments on the proposed debt initiative.
- Author
- Philip J. Pierre, Chair of the Caribbean Community
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Nigel Farage responds to Burnham's openness to a formal apology
About this source
The Reform UK leader's post quotes Burnham's Guardian article and sets out why he opposes a formal apology.
- Author
- Nigel Farage
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Kemi Badenoch on a formal apology and reparations
About this source
Long post by the Conservative leader responding to Burnham's Guardian article, on a formal apology, reparations and debt relief.
- Author
- Kemi Badenoch
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Kay Burley replies to Braverman from Elmina Castle
About this source
Burley quote-posts Braverman's post about a formal apology, with a photo she took after visiting Elmina Castle in Ghana.
- Author
- Kay Burley
- Published
- Accessed
Original post
Suella Braverman calls a formal slavery apology "dangerous virtue-signalling"
About this source
Braverman quote-posts a Reuters post reporting that Burnham is open to a formal apology for slavery but rules out reparations.
- Author
- Suella Braverman
- Published
- Accessed
Share or embed this case
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the case page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/cases/burnham-uk-slavery-apology-reparations
The Dispute Index. "Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for slavery and rules out reparations; Conservative and Reform UK leaders object, and CARICOM calls for repair". First published: 2026-11-03. Last updated: 2026-11-03. https://disputeindex.com/cases/burnham-uk-slavery-apology-reparations