All topics

Press Freedom

Public disputes concerning journalists' and news organizations' access to officials, government spaces and information, including credentials, press pools and official responses to coverage.

Published coverage on this page: 1 case · 1 statement. Statements are ordered newest first.

Related cases

Statements

Filter by response label (1 selected)

Labels describe a response to the linked claim or the action explained in the statement summary. Choose one or more.

1 matching statement

Eugene Volokh

Role at the time: Thomas M. Siebel Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and professor emeritus at UCLA School of Law, in a signed post on the Volokh Conspiracy blog at Reason

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

In a signed post on the Volokh Conspiracy blog at Reason, law professor Eugene Volokh wrote that, according to the D.C. Circuit, the government may not exclude press outlets based on viewpoint from spaces broadly opened to the press, such as the main White House press briefing room, but may do so from spaces such as Oval Office interviews. He wrote that an exclusion resting on an objective viewpoint-neutral judgment “might be permissible,” while one based in part on disapproval of the three outlets’ perspectives or editorial judgments would likely be seen as viewpoint discrimination.

Quotation excerpt

But if the exclusion is based in part on disapproval of CNN's, MS NOW's, and Politico's perspectives or editorial judgments as being unfair or unsound, that would likely be seen as viewpoint-discrimination—which, again, is unconstitutional…
Read full quotation
But if the exclusion is based in part on disapproval of CNN's, MS NOW's, and Politico's perspectives or editorial judgments as being unfair or unsound, that would likely be seen as viewpoint-discrimination—which, again, is unconstitutional as to the main press briefing room but constitutional as to the Oval Office.
Open source (opens in a new tab)Can President Trump Ban CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House? · Reason MagazineFinal paragraph, second sentence (begins 'But if the exclusion is based in part on disapproval'); the preceding sentence in the same paragraph gives the 'might be permissible' alternative.

What this label refers to

The case’s fixed reference point is President Trump’s announcement, by Truth Social post at 3:04 PM EDT on Sept. 18, 2026 and reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. Volokh’s words neither approve nor reject the announced exclusion: he writes that its constitutionality depends on the space (unconstitutional as to the main press briefing room, constitutional as to the Oval Office) and on whether it rests on a viewpoint-neutral judgment, which “might be permissible,” or on disapproval of the outlets’ perspectives, and he does not say which basis applies here. The closest competing label is condemns, because he says an exclusion based in part on such disapproval would likely be seen as viewpoint discrimination. That loses because the same sentence calls such an exclusion constitutional as to the Oval Office, so his conclusion turns on an express condition rather than rejecting the act.

People in this topic

Ward Clark

Ward Clark is a contributor to the conservative news and opinion site RedState.

1 case and 1 statement

Sarah Huckabee Sanders

Sarah Huckabee Sanders is the Republican Governor of Arkansas, elected in 2022, and served as White House press secretary from 2017 to 2019 in President Trump's first administration.

1 case and 1 statement

John Roberts

John Roberts is a co-anchor of Fox News Channel's America Reports and a longtime White House correspondent.

1 case and 1 statement

Guy Benson

Guy Benson is a Fox News political analyst, host of The Guy Benson Show and a senior columnist at the Washington Examiner.

1 case and 1 statement

Eugene Volokh

American legal scholar of the First Amendment and constitutional law; the Thomas M. Siebel Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor emeritus at UCLA School of Law. Founder and coauthor of The Volokh Conspiracy, a legal blog hosted at Reason.

1 case and 1 statement

Brit Hume

Brit Hume is chief political analyst for Fox News Channel, which he joined in 1996. Before that he spent 23 years at ABC News, including as chief White House correspondent from 1989 through 1996.

1 case and 1 statement

Ari Fleischer

Ari Fleischer is a contributor to Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network and was White House press secretary to President George W. Bush. He is president of the communications firms Ari Fleischer Communications and Ari Fleischer Sports Communications.

1 case and 1 statement

Jonathan Turley

Jonathan Turley is a law professor at George Washington University Law School, a columnist and a legal analyst who writes frequently on prosecutorial conduct and constitutional law.

1 case and 1 statement

JB Pritzker

JB Pritzker is the Democratic Governor of Illinois, first elected in 2018.

1 case and 1 statement

Matt Vespa

Managing editor, Townhall.

1 case and 1 statement

Chris Coons

United States Senator and Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Delaware

1 case and 1 statement

Robert Garcia

United States representative for California's 42nd Congressional District and ranking member of the House Oversight Committee.

1 case and 1 statement

More people