Public disputes concerning journalists' and news organizations' access to officials, government spaces and information, including credentials, press pools and official responses to coverage.
Published coverage on this page: 1 case · 20 statements. Statements are ordered newest first.
President Trump announced on September 18 that he is excluding CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage. The outlets cite constitutional protections and say their reporters were turned away September 19; Trump says they publish false stories.
Published
Read the caseLabels describe a response to the linked claim or the action explained in the statement summary. Choose one or more.
20 matching statements
Role at the time: News network, in a statement posted by MS NOW Public Relations and reported in its own story
Statement summary
In a statement issued Saturday, September 19, after two of its journalists were denied entry to the White House, MS NOW said it intends to take any and all steps necessary to defend its First Amendment rights and the essential role of independent journalism in a democracy.
“MS NOW intends to take any and all steps necessary to defend our First Amendment rights and the essential role of independent journalism in our democracy.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. MS NOW contests the exclusion, committing to any and all steps to defend its rights after its journalists were turned away at the gate. The closest competing label is explicitly_declines, because MS NOW had no immediate comment on Friday. That loses because on Saturday it issued this statement, which takes a position against the exclusion.
Role at the time: Free-speech nonprofit, in a post on its official X account
Statement summary
In a post on X, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression said the White House must comply with the First Amendment when it opens its doors to the press, that the president is as free as any other person to criticize media coverage, but that he cannot ban outlets from the White House because he does not like their reporting or commentary.
Quotation excerpt
“When the White House opens its doors to the press, it must comply with the First Amendment. The president is as free as any other person to criticize media coverage. But he can’t ban outlets from the White House just because he doesn’t like…”
“When the White House opens its doors to the press, it must comply with the First Amendment. The president is as free as any other person to criticize media coverage. But he can’t ban outlets from the White House just because he doesn’t like their reporting or commentary.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. FIRE rejects the exclusion while defending the president's freedom to criticize coverage. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because FIRE grants that the president may criticize the media. That loses because that concession is about speech, not about the exclusion, which FIRE says he cannot do.
Role at the time: Press-freedom nonprofit, in a press release by chief of advocacy Seth Stern
Statement summary
In a press release, Freedom of the Press Foundation advocacy chief Seth Stern said it is difficult to imagine a more blatant violation of the First Amendment than banning news outlets from the White House for criticizing the government, and that it is also hard to imagine a dumber move.
“It’s difficult to imagine a more blatant violation of the First Amendment than Trump banning news outlets from the People’s House for criticizing the government. It’s also hard to imagine a dumber move.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. The foundation condemns the exclusion as a blatant First Amendment violation. The closest competing label is minimizes, because Stern also says it is a "dumber move" that will not help Trump. That loses because his first sentence calls the act a blatant constitutional violation, which is condemnation rather than downplaying.
Role at the time: Free-speech litigation and advocacy institute, in a press statement by executive director Jameel Jaffer
Statement summary
In a statement by executive director Jameel Jaffer, the Knight First Amendment Institute said the First Amendment prohibits the president from punishing journalists for coverage he dislikes, and that if Trump means to expel the outlets from the White House press pool his action is doubly unconstitutional because the pool is a public forum from which journalists cannot be excluded for their viewpoints.
Quotation excerpt
“The First Amendment prohibits the president from punishing journalists because he doesn’t like their coverage, just as it prohibits him from punishing universities because he doesn’t like the courses they offer, or from punishing law firms…”
“The First Amendment prohibits the president from punishing journalists because he doesn’t like their coverage, just as it prohibits him from punishing universities because he doesn’t like the courses they offer, or from punishing law firms because he doesn’t like the clients they represent. With so many courts having ruled against him on exactly this point, you’d think President Trump would have learned this lesson by now. If President Trump means to expel these news organizations from the White House press pool, his action is doubly unconstitutional because the press pool is a ‘public forum’ under the First Amendment, which means the president can’t exclude journalists from it on the basis of their viewpoints.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. The Knight Institute rejects the exclusion, saying punishing journalists for coverage is barred by the First Amendment. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because the "doubly unconstitutional" argument begins "If President Trump means to expel these news organizations from the White House press pool". That loses because the condition only adds a second ground; the first sentence is an unconditional rejection.
Role at the time: Legal organization for journalists, in a statement by president Bruce D. Brown on its website
Statement summary
In a statement on the Reporters Committee's website, president Bruce D. Brown said a ban like this would be flatly unconstitutional, that once the White House invites in some journalists it cannot ban others because it does not like their reporting, and that it is textbook viewpoint discrimination that courts would quickly strike down if challenged.
Quotation excerpt
“A ban like this would be flatly unconstitutional. The First Amendment is clear that once the White House invites in some journalists, it can’t ban others because it doesn’t like their reporting. This is textbook viewpoint discrimination and…”
“A ban like this would be flatly unconstitutional. The First Amendment is clear that once the White House invites in some journalists, it can’t ban others because it doesn’t like their reporting. This is textbook viewpoint discrimination and will be quickly struck down by the courts if challenged.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. The Reporters Committee rejects the exclusion as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because the statement says a ban would be struck down "if challenged". That loses because the condition is about a lawsuit being filed, not a qualification of its position, which is unqualified rejection.
Role at the time: Association representing the White House press corps, in a statement signed by its president, Jacqui Heinrich
Statement summary
In a statement signed by its president, Jacqui Heinrich, the White House Correspondents' Association said the Constitution protects the press from government interference regardless of whether the president likes a news organization's coverage, that the issue is the public's right to an independent account of a president's decisions, and that it stands in defense of colleagues at CNN, MSNOW and Politico "who are being singled out for doing their jobs".
Quotation excerpt
“The Constitution protects the freedom of the press from government interference. That protection does not depend on whether the president likes a news organization’s coverage, agrees with its reporting, or approves of the questions its…”
“The Constitution protects the freedom of the press from government interference. That protection does not depend on whether the president likes a news organization’s coverage, agrees with its reporting, or approves of the questions its journalists ask. This is about more than the rights of journalists. It is about the right of the American people to receive a full and independent account of the activities, policies and decisions of whoever occupies the nation’s highest office. The WHCA stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO who are being singled out for doing their jobs.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. The association, which represents the White House press corps, rejects the exclusion and defends the targeted outlets. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because the statement's first sentence disputes how Trump described his own action. That loses because the statement goes on to defend the outlets and assert a constitutional bar on the conduct.
Role at the time: Newspaper, in a statement by spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander posted by NYTimes Communications
Statement summary
In a statement posted by NYTimes Communications, spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander said the president's statement was yet another retaliatory and unconstitutional threat and that The Times stands in support of the news organizations being unfairly targeted.
“The president’s statement today is yet another retaliatory and unconstitutional threat. The Times stands in support of the news organizations being unfairly targeted by the president.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. The Times, which Trump named in the Oval Office as fake news and a possible next target, calls the announcement retaliatory and unconstitutional. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because the statement is partly about how the administration treats the press generally. That loses because it expressly characterizes the announcement as unconstitutional retaliation and supports the targeted outlets.
Role at the time: News organization, in a statement posted by its press account POLITICOPress
Statement summary
In a statement posted by its press account, Politico said it will keep reporting fairly on this and future White Houses, will vigorously defend its First Amendment rights against any attempt to restrict them, and that claims it received government subsidies are false and have been thoroughly debunked.
Quotation excerpt
“POLITICO will continue to fairly report on this White House and future ones. We will vigorously defend our First Amendment rights against any attempt to restrict them. The claims that POLITICO received government subsidies are false and…”
“POLITICO will continue to fairly report on this White House and future ones. We will vigorously defend our First Amendment rights against any attempt to restrict them. The claims that POLITICO received government subsidies are false and have been thoroughly debunked.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. Politico commits to contest any attempt to restrict its access and rebuts the subsidy claim Trump used to justify including it. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because one of the three sentences disputes the subsidy claim. That loses because the statement's main commitment is to resist restrictions on its constitutional rights, which rejects the exclusion.
Role at the time: News network, in a statement posted by CNN Communications and reported in its own story
Statement summary
In a statement issued Friday, CNN said it stands behind its White House team and has a right under the Constitution to report without interference from the government, and that if the ban Trump threatened goes ahead it would be an illegal assault on that constitutionally protected right.
“Should the ban which President Trump threatened go ahead, it would be an illegal assault on that fundamental and constitutionally-protected right.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. CNN rejects the announced exclusion, calling it, if carried out, an illegal assault on a constitutional right. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because the sentence begins "Should the ban ... go ahead". That loses because the condition concerns implementation of the announcement; CNN states no support for the act under any condition.
Role at the time: Fox News political analyst and host of The Guy Benson Show, in a post on his own X account
Statement summary
In an X post, Fox News political analyst Guy Benson wrote that the White House media ban, even for those who dislike the targeted outlets, is a bad idea and bad precedent, that it is what Trump does when he feels things are not going well politically, and that beyond his loyalist base it achieves nothing and is exhausting.
Quotation excerpt
“The WH media ban, even if you hate the targeted outlets, is a bad idea & bad precedent. It’s the sort of thing he does when he doesn’t feel like things are going well politically. Beyond his hardcore loyalist base, it achieves nothing and…”
“The WH media ban, even if you hate the targeted outlets, is a bad idea & bad precedent. It’s the sort of thing he does when he doesn’t feel like things are going well politically. Beyond his hardcore loyalist base, it achieves nothing and is exhausting.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement on September 18, 2026 that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, as reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon. Benson criticizes the exclusion as a bad idea and bad precedent, even as he grants that some dislike the outlets. The closest competing label is minimizes, because he says it "achieves nothing". That loses because he opens by calling the act a bad idea and bad precedent, which is criticism of the conduct itself rather than downplaying it.
Role at the time: International press-freedom organization, in a post on its official international X account (@RSF_inter)
Statement summary
In a post on its international X account on September 18, 2026, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said it was appalled by Trump's threat to ban CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over coverage he dislikes. RSF said press access is a right that lets the American people be independently informed, not a privilege for journalists, and that it is exploring legal avenues to respond.
“RSF is appalled by Trump’s threat to ban @CNN, @MSNOWNews and @Politico from the White House over coverage he dislikes. Press access is not a privilege for journalists.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post on Friday, September 18, 2026 and reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. Relative to that act, RSF says it is appalled by Trump's threat to ban the three outlets over coverage he dislikes and that press access is a right rather than a privilege, which is an express rejection of the exclusion. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because RSF calls the announcement a threat to ban rather than a completed ban. That loses because the word describes the announcement without softening RSF's evaluation, which is a clear substantive condemnation; its statement that it is exploring legal avenues describes a possible response and does not make that view conditional.
Role at the time: British broadcaster and commentator, in a post on his X account addressed to President Trump
Statement summary
In an X post addressed to President Trump on the evening of September 18, Piers Morgan said the announced exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House is a very bad decision and unconstitutional. He wrote that it is the media's job to hold the president and his administration to rigorous account rather than give endless praise.
Quotation excerpt
“This is a very bad decision, President @realDonaldTrump - it's not the media's job to give you endless praise. It's their job to hold you and your administration to rigorous account. Banning them is a suppression of free speech and…”
“This is a very bad decision, President @realDonaldTrump - it's not the media's job to give you endless praise. It's their job to hold you and your administration to rigorous account. Banning them is a suppression of free speech and unconstitutional.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post at 3:04 PM EDT on Friday 2026-09-18 and reaffirmed on camera in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. Relative to that act, Morgan expresses rejection: he calls the announcement a very bad decision, says the media's job is to hold the administration to rigorous account, and says banning them is a suppression of free speech and unconstitutional, with a screenshot of the announcement attached to the post. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because part of the post is about what the media's job is; that loses because the post goes on to criticize the exclusion itself as unconstitutional rather than only disputing a description of it.
Role at the time: International press-freedom nonprofit, in a press release datelined Miami that also quotes its Americas Regional Director, José Zamora
Statement summary
In a press release on its website, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Trump's announced exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico violates First Amendment rights and is an alarming escalation in how far the administration will go to control the narrative and silence critical coverage. The release also quotes its Americas Regional Director, José Zamora, calling the action arbitrary and saying journalists must be allowed to do their jobs free from retaliation.
“President Trump’s arbitrary CNN, MS NOW, Politico ban violates First Amendment rights”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post at 3:04 PM EDT on Friday 2026-09-18 and reaffirmed on camera in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. In its release headline and lead paragraph CPJ says the announced order violates First Amendment rights and is an alarming escalation, which rejects excluding the outlets. The closest competing label is minimizes, because the release also notes that sources told CPJ there were no signs officials had followed through on the directive. That loses because the note is a factual report attached to the statement, not a downplaying of it, and CPJ's own words treat the announced order as a rights violation and an escalation.
Role at the time: Governor of Illinois, posting on his verified X account and his Bluesky account
Statement summary
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker posted on X, quoting a post that reproduced the core of Trump's Truth Social announcement, and repeated the text on Bluesky with a screenshot of that post. He called the announcement yet another attack on the First Amendment and said Trump was acting against journalists he dislikes to keep the public from hearing about his record.
“This is yet another attack on the First Amendment”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post at 3:04 PM EDT on Friday 2026-09-18 and reaffirmed on camera in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. Pritzker, quoting a post that reproduced the announcement, calls it yet another attack on the First Amendment and says Trump is acting against journalists he dislikes to keep the public from hearing about his record, which rejects excluding the outlets. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because the post also disputes Trump's stated reason by attributing a different motive. That loses because the motive claim supports, rather than replaces, an express condemnation of the act as an attack on the First Amendment.
Role at the time: U.S. Representative for California and ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, posting on his official X and Bluesky accounts
Statement summary
Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, posted on X and Bluesky about half an hour after Trump's Truth Social announcement, sharing an Associated Press report on it. He called the attacks on free speech insane, said the action was censorship at North Korea levels rather than freedom of the press, and said the First Amendment must be defended at all costs.
“This isn’t freedom of the press; it’s North Korea levels of censorship.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post at 3:04 PM EDT on Friday 2026-09-18 and reaffirmed on camera in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. Garcia, posting about half an hour after the announcement and sharing an AP report on it, calls the attacks on free speech insane and says the action is censorship rather than freedom of the press, which rejects excluding the outlets. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because he contrasts the act with freedom of the press and relabels it censorship. That loses because he goes on to condemn the act outright and calls for defending the First Amendment at all costs.
Role at the time: United States senator from Delaware, posting on his official Bluesky account
Statement summary
In a Bluesky post quoting an Aaron Rupar post that relays Trump’s announcement, Sen. Chris Coons wrote that Trump was “once again trying to use the power of the presidency to punish a free press, now banning CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House.” He called that “the behavior of an authoritarian” and wrote that “we must defend the press' right to hold those in power accountable.”
Quotation excerpt
“Trump is once again trying to use the power of the presidency to punish a free press, now banning CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House. That is the behavior of an authoritarian, and we must defend the press' right to hold those in…”
“Trump is once again trying to use the power of the presidency to punish a free press, now banning CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House. That is the behavior of an authoritarian, and we must defend the press' right to hold those in power accountable.”
What this label refers to
The case’s fixed reference point is President Trump’s announcement, by Truth Social post at 3:04 PM EDT on Sept. 18, 2026 and reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. Coons’s post says Trump is “trying to use the power of the presidency to punish a free press, now banning CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House” and calls that “the behavior of an authoritarian,” which rejects the act itself. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, because he recasts the announcement as punishment of a free press rather than a response to coverage. That loses because he goes on to condemn the conduct in plain terms and to call for defending the press’s right to hold power accountable.
Role at the time: United States senator from New York and Senate Democratic leader, posting on his official X account
Statement summary
In a post on X quoting a MeidasTouch post that relays Trump’s announcement, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer wrote that Trump “just did what dictators throughout history have done.” Addressing @realDonaldTrump, he added: “this is a democracy. You will not be able to manipulate the news or hide the truth.”
“Donald Trump just did what dictators throughout history have done. @realDonaldTrump - this is a democracy. You will not be able to manipulate the news or hide the truth.”
What this label refers to
The case’s fixed reference point is President Trump’s announcement, by Truth Social post at 3:04 PM EDT on Sept. 18, 2026 and reaffirmed in the Oval Office that afternoon, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage. Schumer’s post, which quotes a post reporting that announcement, says Trump “just did what dictators throughout history have done” and that he “will not be able to manipulate the news or hide the truth,” which rejects the act itself. The closest competing label is challenges_characterization, since the closing line could be read as answering Trump’s description of the outlets. That loses because the passage goes on to a plain condemnation of the conduct rather than only disputing a label.
Role at the time: Chief political analyst at Fox News Channel, on his personal X account
Statement summary
Fox News chief political analyst Brit Hume quote-posted Jonathan Turley's criticism of President Trump's announced exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, adding "100%." He also wrote that if Trump thinks the move will lead to more favorable coverage, he is dreaming.
“100%. And If he thinks this will lead to more favorable coverage, I think he's dreaming.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post and again in the Oval Office on September 18, 2026, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, that is, excluding named news organizations from White House access over what they report. Hume quote-posts Jonathan Turley's criticism of the announced exclusion with "100%," an express statement of agreement, and adds that Trump is "dreaming" if he expects it to bring more favorable coverage, a practical argument against the move. The closest competing label is minimizes, because predicting that the move will not achieve its aim could be read as downplaying its consequences. That loses because Hume pairs the prediction with agreement that the exclusion is objectionable, which treats it as something to oppose rather than as inconsequential.
Role at the time: Law professor at George Washington University Law School and Fox News contributor, on his personal X account
Statement summary
Fox News contributor and law professor Jonathan Turley wrote in an X thread, reacting to Trump's reaffirmation of his intention to exclude CNN, Politico and MS NOW from the White House, that he has often joined criticism of the outlets' bias but considers barring disfavored media a terrible precedent and practice. He said such a move would be an attack on long-standing free-press principles and, in a second post, that it would raise serious constitutional questions.
“barring disfavored media from the White House is a terrible precedent and practice”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post and again in the Oval Office on September 18, 2026, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, that is, excluding named news organizations from White House access over what they report. Turley, reacting to Trump's reaffirmation of the announcement, writes that "barring disfavored media from the White House is a terrible precedent and practice," and in the same thread that such a move would be an assault on free-press principles and would raise serious constitutional questions, which criticizes the exclusion itself on principle and on legal grounds. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because he says he has often joined criticism of the outlets' bias and uses conditional phrasing ("would") for the announced move. That loses because the bias remark concerns coverage, which is outside the reference point, and his evaluation of the exclusion does not depend on its scope or on any unresolved condition.
Role at the time: Former White House press secretary and Fox News contributor, on his personal X account
Statement summary
Fox News contributor and former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer wrote on X that he agrees with President Trump that several media outlets covering the White House are biased and unfair, but that excluding them is not the solution. He urged opening the pool and the briefing room to conservatives to challenge liberal reporters, and warned that conservatives could someday be excluded in the same way.
“Banning them from the WH is not the solution.”
What this label refers to
The case's fixed reference point is President Trump's announcement, by Truth Social post and again in the Oval Office on September 18, 2026, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico are banned from the White House because of their coverage, that is, excluding named news organizations from White House access over what they report. Fleischer writes "Banning them from the WH is not the solution," an express rejection of the exclusion, and the rest of his post proposes opening the pool and briefing room to conservatives as the alternative. The closest competing label is mixed_or_conditional, because the same post says he agrees with Trump that several outlets covering the White House are biased and unfair. That loses because the agreement concerns the outlets' coverage, which is outside the reference point, and his rejection of the exclusion carries no condition.
Ward Clark is a contributor to the conservative news and opinion site RedState.
1 case and 1 statement
Sarah Huckabee Sanders is the Republican Governor of Arkansas, elected in 2022, and served as White House press secretary from 2017 to 2019 in President Trump's first administration.
1 case and 1 statement
John Roberts is a co-anchor of Fox News Channel's America Reports and a longtime White House correspondent.
1 case and 1 statement
Guy Benson is a Fox News political analyst, host of The Guy Benson Show and a senior columnist at the Washington Examiner.
1 case and 1 statement
American legal scholar of the First Amendment and constitutional law; the Thomas M. Siebel Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor emeritus at UCLA School of Law. Founder and coauthor of The Volokh Conspiracy, a legal blog hosted at Reason.
1 case and 1 statement
Brit Hume is chief political analyst for Fox News Channel, which he joined in 1996. Before that he spent 23 years at ABC News, including as chief White House correspondent from 1989 through 1996.
1 case and 1 statement
Ari Fleischer is a contributor to Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network and was White House press secretary to President George W. Bush. He is president of the communications firms Ari Fleischer Communications and Ari Fleischer Sports Communications.
1 case and 1 statement
Jonathan Turley is a law professor at George Washington University Law School, a columnist and a legal analyst who writes frequently on prosecutorial conduct and constitutional law.
1 case and 1 statement
JB Pritzker is the Democratic Governor of Illinois, first elected in 2018.
1 case and 1 statement
Managing editor, Townhall.
1 case and 1 statement
United States Senator and Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Delaware
1 case and 1 statement
United States representative for California's 42nd Congressional District and ranking member of the House Oversight Committee.
1 case and 1 statement
