Tae Kim
Role at the time: Personal public post by Tae Kim; not established as an institutional or corporate statement.
Challenged the characterization
Statement summary
Kim rejects Hubinger's warning and argues that Hubinger should resign if he believes it. He criticizes the public statement for giving AI opponents material that could support policies harmful to AI infrastructure development.
“I don't believe this. But if Evan believes this, he should resign right now.”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Tae Kim on Coxon’s warning and the frontier AI safety debate · Tae Kim
Full primary public post and available surrounding thread. Speaker and position scope are explained in the linked event.
Why we used this label
Rejects the warning and criticizes its policy consequences; offers no technical risk estimate.