Tae Kim on Artificial Intelligence

Statements and actions by Tae Kim on this topic.

Public disputes concerning artificial intelligence, including its development, uses, safety, governance, effects on creative work, and role in research.

How we classify topics

Condemned0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Defended or excused0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Challenged the characterization1Statements: September 9, 2026. Not selected. Activate to add.Minimized0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Mixed or conditional0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.Explicitly stayed out0No statements. Not selected. Activate to add.

Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.

By category Timeline

Statement history

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 9, 2026

1 matching statement. Dates: September 9, 2026

1 published statement. Dates: September 9, 2026

Challenged the characterization

1 published statement. Dates: September 9, 2026

1 statement on this page. Dates: September 9, 2026

Tae Kim

Role at the time: Personal public post by Tae Kim; not established as an institutional or corporate statement.

September 9, 2026Challenged the characterization

Responding to

Is Anthropic acting responsibly while advancing toward recursive self-improvement?

"I don't believe this. But if Evan believes this, he should resign right now."

Why we used this label

Rejects the warning and criticizes its policy consequences; offers no technical risk estimate.

Tae Kim on Coxon’s warning and the frontier AI safety debate

(opens in a new tab)

- Tae Kim

Full primary public post and available surrounding thread. Speaker and position scope are explained in the linked event.

Read statement Is Anthropic acting responsibly while advancing toward recursive self-improvement?