Loading record
Public disputes concerning artificial intelligence, including its development, uses, safety, governance, effects on creative work, and role in research.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: October 12, 2026 to October 24, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: October 12, 2026 to October 24, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: October 12, 2026 to October 24, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: October 12, 2026 to October 24, 2026
2 statements on this page. Dates: October 12, 2026 to October 24, 2026
Role at the time: Defendant posting on his public X account
Statement summary
Boteach calls the targeted discovery order a threat to Americans' AI privacy and frames his objection in constitutional terms.
“JUDGE MARTY ELFENBEIN’S RULING HAS PUT EVERY AMERICAN’S AI PRIVACY AT RISK”
Boteach criticizes the discovery order as a threat to AI privacy. The post also contains his separate accusations about the litigation.
The case concerns discovery of his AI communications. Boteach expressly criticizes the ruling authorizing targeted requests.
Role at the time: Defendant acting through litigation counsel
Statement summary
Boteach asks the court to sustain his objections to the proposed AI-provider subpoenas as drafted.
“The Court should sustain the objections to the proposed AI-provider subpoenas as drafted”
The defense challenges the scope of reopened damages discovery and seeks protection for qualifying litigation-preparation material.
The case concerns the hotel's discovery requests. Boteach expressly rejects the subpoenas as drafted and asks the court to sustain his objections.
