Sébastien Bubeck
Role at the time: OpenAI participant replying directly to Alpöge
Response to this claim
Alpöge says his exclusion appeared to be a settled condition of the proposed collaboration.
“nothing at all was locked”
Loading record
Public disputes concerning scientific research, research methods, authorship, credit, collaboration, publication, and research conduct.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: September 8, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: September 8, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: September 8, 2026
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 8, 2026
Role at the time: OpenAI participant replying directly to Alpöge
Response to this claim
Alpöge says his exclusion appeared to be a settled condition of the proposed collaboration.
“nothing at all was locked”
Direct reply to Alpöge; says negotiations remained open and further discussions were possible.
Direct denial of the characterization that the outcome was predetermined.
Role at the time: OpenAI participant giving his firsthand account
Response to this claim
Bubeck says the disputed authorship proposal concerned a rewrite of OpenAI's proof, not removing Alpöge from his own work.
“I never ever asked for Levent to be removed from authorship of his own work”
Includes authorship context, apology for career wording and continued rejection of the allegations. Technical follow-up is included in the captured thread.
Direct counter-characterization, with a limited apology rather than a withdrawal of his defense.