Sara Jacobs on U.S. Politics

The reference point is whether Trump's remark meant Iranian attacks on Los Angeles and San Diego would be an acceptable price for the war, as critics read it, rather than that the war prevents a nuclear Iran from being able to attack them, as the White House says. Jacobs answers the remark by rejecting the idea that her constituents are acceptable collateral damage, which treats the remark as accepting harm to San Diego and criticizes it. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, but she objects to what she takes Trump to have said rather than to how others described it. Evidence: Jacobs's own post on X.