Patrick J. Schiltz
Role at the time: U.S. district judge responding to the misconduct complaint
Response to this claim
The judges' public immigration-enforcement comments compromise their impartiality and warrant recusal.
“well within the ethical rules that apply to federal judges in speaking to the New York Times.”
Why we used this label
He disputes DOJ's characterization of his remarks as prohibited partisan speech, rather than defending DOJ's recusal demand.
