Loading record
Public disputes concerning energy supply, infrastructure, prices, regulation and the transition between energy sources.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: August 23, 2025 to December 22, 2025
2 matching statements. Dates: August 23, 2025 to December 22, 2025
2 published statements. Dates: August 23, 2025 to December 22, 2025
2 published statements. Dates: August 23, 2025 to December 22, 2025
2 statements on this page. Dates: August 23, 2025 to December 22, 2025
Role at the time: Governor of Connecticut
Statement summary
Ned Lamont says the latest halt would increase electricity prices and undermine business predictability.
“Businesses and residents deserve economic predictability, yet with the administration’s constant starts and stops they’re left with the opposite, so the one thing the people of Connecticut can count on is that we will stand up to the Trump administration and ensure this project continues to move forward.”
Connecticut's governor responded to the December attempt to stop the nearly complete project.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Lamont criticizes the renewed construction halt and the uncertainty caused by repeated stops and starts.
Role at the time: Governor of Connecticut, in a joint press release with Rhode Island's governor
Statement summary
Lamont called the August stop-work order a "political move" that would raise electricity bills, and said it "contradicts everything the administration has told us".
“This political move by the Trump administration will drive up the cost of electricity bills and contradicts everything the administration has told us.”
Joint press release from the governors of Connecticut and Rhode Island the day after BOEM ordered work stopped. Lamont's statement criticizes the halt and says it contradicts what the administration had told the states.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Lamont calls the August order political, says it contradicts the administration's own assurances, and says it will raise costs. He rejects the action itself rather than only disputing a label, so condemns fits better than “Challenged the characterization”.
