Nan Jiang
Role at the time: Personal response to Bubeck's explanation
Condemned
Response to this claim
Jiang argues that even an offer of authorship on OpenAI's proof did not justify unilaterally excluding the other team's collaborator.
“you unilaterally tried to dictate who from other side can stay on the paper”
Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Nan Jiang challenges the proposed authorship arrangements after Bubeck's clarification
Crucial follow-up explicitly acknowledges that the proposed authorship was on OpenAI's work, while maintaining his criticism of excluding the other collaborator.
Why we used this label
A substantive criticism that survives the distinction between the two teams' proofs.