Tim Miller: Piker was "absolutely right" on the Middle East but should stop making himself the issue
Host of The Bulwark Daily, in a scripted and interview programme
“Everybody knows that I have been kind of dragging the moderates for making the Hassan Piker thing a bigger deal than it should be. And it's like, Hassan Piker has some bad views, but also he was absolutely right about what the U.S. should be doing with regards to the wars in the Middle East, and that is the salient issue of the midterm, and Democrats should be trying to reach out to anti-war voters and not scare them away. And so I still feel that way. But then Hassan has decided to do an interview with Axios for some reason … and he's getting asked about whether the U.S. is worse than al-Qaeda and he's like yes, and I'm going, bro, please … stop making yourself the central issue of the Michigan race. Like you can still live stream, do your thing. But who is benefiting from you talking to Axios?”
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
Episode of The Bulwark Daily published September 17, 2026, hosted by Tim Miller with guests Jesse Lehrich and Wright Thompson. Most of the episode concerns midterm forecasting, Mississippi and college football and is unrelated to this dossier. Miller reads the advertisements, which identifies him as the speaker in the passage recorded here; Lehrich responds. Two passages are deliberately not treated as positions: the mention of Thomas Massie, Pete Hegseth and the House recess at 29:03 occurs inside a paid sponsor read for the Trump Epstein Reading Room rather than in editorial commentary, and the 34:25–36:00 segment discusses which 2028 candidates are strongest on AI risk, quoting Ro Khanna secondhand as having said Dario Amodei's letter "didn't go nearly far enough" and that AI executives "should all be in jail" — that quotation is reported by Lehrich and has not been verified against a primary source.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The episode had been discussing the Michigan Senate race and Democratic prospects in the midterms. Miller prefaced the passage by noting his established position that moderates had overstated the Piker issue.
After the quotation
Miller went on to criticise Abdul El-Sayed's manner, saying he can be condescending and that having campaigned with Piker he now has to live with the questions or distance himself, while adding that the Michigan race was not a close call for him and that he would gladly vote for El-Sayed. Those remarks concern the Michigan race rather than Piker's claim and are not recorded here.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Hasan Piker's Axios Show interview claims about terrorism, Iran, China and Israel
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point for this record is Piker's claim that the United States commits more terrorism than al-Qaeda. Miller combines materially different responses to it. He restates a defence of Piker's broader position on the Middle East wars, calling him absolutely right on that and warning Democrats against alienating anti-war voters, while treating this particular answer as a political error that makes Piker the story. He neither endorses the comparison nor rejects it on the merits. That is the same shape as Philip DeFranco (982), also classified mixed_or_conditional. The closest competing label is condemns; it loses because his criticism is of the decision to give the interview rather than of the claim, and it sits alongside an explicit defence of Piker's underlying foreign-policy view.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Hasan Piker
Hasan Piker's Axios Show interview claims about terrorism, Iran, China and Israel
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“If you'll recall, Hasan didn't even bring up al-Qaeda on his own volition. It was the interviewer who chose to invoke al-Qaeda. ... The goal was to farm outrage off of him specifically to tee up attacks against Abdul El-Sayed, a Muslim candidate that the Republican Party wants you to believe is a terrorist sympathizer.”Read statement
“I don't think Israel in its current formation should be an ally, but I also feel that same exact way about Saudi Arabia. I feel that same exact way about countries that are operating in illiberal and undemocratic authoritarian ways. Of course, that standard is not applied to American allies at all.”Read statement
“I believe Zionism is fascism. However, I live in the United States of America. So I have to deal with a lot of people who I personally think exhibit the qualities of fascists. And yet we sometimes still organize with these people. ... I'm not worried that they're going to be violent against Zionists. No, I'm not.”Read statement