Matt Vespa calls Massie's impeachment push "reckless nonsense" that was never going to pass
Senior writer at Townhall, in signed commentary
“When you lose your primary and are viewed as an overall pain in the a**, you're going to do even more reckless nonsense. … That's cute, man. It also isn't going to happen. This whole effort, which was never going to pass, was officially declared dead yesterday. … Well, that's life.”
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
Townhall commentary published September 17, 2026, 6:55 AM. Vespa dismisses Massie's impeachment resolution as reckless nonsense from an outgoing member who lost his primary, and says the effort was never going to pass. Most of the piece is a block quotation from ABC News describing Massie's 67-minute floor reading and quoting the resolution itself; those passages are ABC's reporting and the resolution's text, not Vespa's. The piece also embeds a post by Eric Daugherty asserting that Hegseth "did NOTHING illegal" — that is Daugherty's claim, quoted by Vespa, and is not attributed to Vespa here. Vespa's prediction that Massie will mount a 2028 presidential run is his speculation.
Before the quotation
Massie read eight articles of impeachment against Hegseth on the House floor for more than an hour on Tuesday and made the resolution privileged. Speaker Johnson then sent the House home a day early for a seven-week recess, deferring any vote until November.
After the quotation
Vespa quotes a post by Eric Daugherty stating that Johnson had blocked the vote until at least November 9 and asserting Hegseth did nothing illegal; that assertion is Daugherty's and is not recorded as Vespa's position. Massie has separately argued the absence of a vote indicates leadership found Republicans willing to support impeachment, recorded elsewhere on this dossier.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
This dossier's fixed reference point is whether Pete Hegseth should be impeached. Vespa rejects the proposition, treating the impeachment push as illegitimate and doomed rather than as a case to answer. That places him with Speaker Johnson (861), who dismissed the same effort as a publicity stunt and is classified defends_or_excuses. The closest competing label is minimizes, since he downplays the effort's prospects rather than defending Hegseth's conduct on the merits; it loses because minimizes requires acknowledging the underlying concern before discounting it, and Vespa concedes no concern about Hegseth at all, treating the resolution itself as the only thing at issue.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Shri Thanedar, Pete Hegseth
Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“For the record, had that vote happened I would have voted YES.”Read statement
“He needs to go, whether it’s impeachment or the most expedient route — just the president to replace him — would be great.”Read statement
“MAGA Mike canceled votes and sent the House home early — to avoid impeaching failed reality star Pete Hegseth. Costs are up. Work is unfinished. And Republicans? Headed home to campaign on their failed policies. The American people deserve a Congress that actually shows up for work.”Read statement