Thom Tillis says Hegseth “needs to go” but declines to back the impeachment route
United States Senator for North Carolina, speaking to reporters at the Capitol
“He needs to go, whether it’s impeachment or the most expedient route — just the president to replace him — would be great.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Reports Senator Thom Tillis’s remarks to reporters on September 17. The headline states that Tillis “supports” the impeachment resolution, but the quotations in the body are narrower: he calls for Hegseth’s removal by impeachment or by presidential replacement, whichever is more expedient, and when asked directly whether Republicans should support the articles he answers “I’ll let the House do what the House is going to do.” The distinction matters for this dossier, whose question is specifically whether the House should impeach.
Before the quotation
Said to reporters on September 17, two days after Massie read his articles of impeachment on the House floor and a day after House leadership deferred any vote until after the midterms.
After the quotation
Tillis added: “I think I’m pretty well staked out on my assessment of Mr. Hegseth.” He is a senator, and impeachment originates in the House; the Senate’s role would arise only at trial.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to the case’s fixed reference point -- whether the House should impeach Hegseth -- Tillis holds two positions at once. He is unequivocal that Hegseth should leave office, which aligns him with the proponents’ objective, but he expressly treats impeachment as only one of two acceptable routes and names presidential replacement as preferable if more expedient. Asked point blank whether Republicans should support the articles, he declined: “I’ll let the House do what the House is going to do.” `condemns` would mislabel a judgement about Hegseth’s fitness as support for impeaching him, which is the question this case asks; `explicitly_declines` understates a speaker who said a great deal on the merits. Note that the reporting outlet’s headline says Tillis “supports” the resolution, which his quoted words do not establish.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Pete Hegseth
Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“For the record, had that vote happened I would have voted YES.”Read statement
“When you lose your primary and are viewed as an overall pain in the a**, you're going to do even more reckless nonsense. … That's cute, man. It also isn't going to happen. This whole effort, which was never going to pass, was officially declared dead yesterday. … Well, that's life.”Read statement
“MAGA Mike canceled votes and sent the House home early — to avoid impeaching failed reality star Pete Hegseth. Costs are up. Work is unfinished. And Republicans? Headed home to campaign on their failed policies. The American people deserve a Congress that actually shows up for work.”Read statement