Reitz tells Blumenthal his threats may amount to unconstitutional investigations
Aaron ReitzU.S. attorney for the Southern District of Texas, in a reply on X
Replying on X to Blumenthal's post about the letter, Reitz writes that congressional investigations need a legitimate legislative purpose and that he believes Blumenthal's threats may begin investigations that lack one.
Responding to
Blumenthal's inquiry into White House ballroom donors threatens citizens for associating with the president and may violate 18 U.S.C. sections 241 and 242.
“Valid investigations must be conducted for a legitimate legislative purpose. I believe that your threatenings may constitute the initiation of unconstitutional investigations conducted for reasons other than a legitimate legislative purpose.”
Original post
Original post
Original post

Where this statement fits
U.S. Attorney Aaron Reitz tells Sen. Blumenthal to preserve records over his ballroom donor inquiry, citing federal civil rights crimes; Blumenthal calls the implied threat baseless
On November 11, 2026, Aaron Reitz, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Texas, posted on X a letter addressed to Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, the incoming chair of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The letter says Blumenthal had threatened citizens for associating with the president and gives him formal notice to preserve documents and communications relevant to what it calls his intent to deprive citizens of their constitutional rights in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 241 and 242. It warns that failing to preserve them could bring sanctions or other penalties, applies the demand to his staff and campaign personnel, and asks him to confirm in writing by November 18. In his post, Reitz wrote that he was taking the first step to stop an abuse of power. The same day, Blumenthal called the implied threat of an investigation baseless, said he would not be intimidated and sent Reitz a letter directing him to preserve his own communications with the White House and senior Justice Department officials about the decision to draft and post the letter. Reitz replied on X that valid investigations need a legitimate legislative purpose. On November 12 he sent Sen. Elissa Slotkin a similar letter about her comments on holding people close to the president accountable.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Reitz acknowledges Blumenthal's response and argues that congressional investigations require a legitimate legislative purpose.
Original post
About this source
Blumenthal describes the letter as an investigation into him for conducting a congressional inquiry and posts his reply to Reitz.
Original post
About this source
Reitz writes that Slotkin's remarks about a deterrence message sound potentially illegal and shares a letter addressed to her.
Before the quotation
Blumenthal had posted that the investigation into him for conducting a congressional inquiry was the latest in a series of unlawful actions by the Trump administration to intimidate members of Congress.
After the quotation
Later that day, Reitz posted about Sen. Elissa Slotkin's remarks on a deterrence message, writing that they sounded potentially illegal to him.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Reitz stands by his letter and argues that Blumenthal's inquiry may be an unconstitutional investigation without a legislative purpose, so we labeled it defends or excuses.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseSchiff says the administration has trouble finding prosecutors to sign its actions
“Translation: We are doing such batshit crazy things that it is hard to find a prosecutor anywhere to put their name on this stuff.”Read statement
Tim Stretton says limits on oversight cannot excuse the executive branch obstructing it
“There are legitimate constitutional limits on congressional oversight investigations, but those limits cannot be used as a blanket excuse for the executive branch to obstruct oversight”Read statement
Jenny Carroll says the letters turn civil rights laws against the administration's critics
“They're taking laws that were designed to protect marginalized people and designed to prevent abuses of state power against individual citizens, and they're flipping it and using it to basically address anyone who is in disagreement with them, and that is not what those laws were designed to do.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Reitz tells Blumenthal his threats may amount to unconstitutional investigations
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/9028-replying-on-x-to-blumenthal-s-post-about
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Reitz tells Blumenthal his threats may amount to unconstitutional investigations". First published: 2026-11-15. Last updated: 2026-11-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/9028-replying-on-x-to-blumenthal-s-post-about