Bonta and other attorneys general call the Postal Service's NEPA rule unlawful and ask USPS to withdraw it

Rob BontaCalifornia attorney general, in a comment letter filed with 17 other states, the District of Columbia, Harris County, Texas, and the City of New York

Condemned

In comments filed with USPS, the coalition says the rule harms the states by curtailing environmental review and public participation beyond what the law allows, calls it unlawful and asks that it be withdrawn in its entirety.

Responding to

The repeal of the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA regulations, Congress's amendments to NEPA and the Supreme Court's Seven County decision require the Postal Service to revise its NEPA regulations and streamline its environmental review process.

“The Rule would harm these State interests by curtailing environmental review and opportunities for public participation in a manner and to an extent not warranted by law. These comments describe how the Rule harms the States and is contrary to NEPA. In sum, the Rule is unlawful. For the reasons stated below, the Attorneys General strongly oppose the Rule and request that it be withdrawn in its entirety.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Comments of the attorneys general of California, New York and other states opposing the Postal Service's NEPA interim final rule33-page comment letter dated November 9, 2026, sent to Postal Service environmental counsel Thomas Shepherd

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

A dark granite sign with the Postal Service eagle logo and the words United States Postal Service Headquarters stands in front of a tan stone office building with tall dark windows.
Credit: Tony Webster / Flickr, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

Where this statement fits

Postal Service rewrites its environmental review rules and adds exclusions for vehicle purchases and mail processing; 18 states, D.C., Harris County and New York City call the rule unlawful

On September 25, 2026, the U.S. Postal Service published an interim final rule, effective that day, that partially rescinds and rewrites its regulations for complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The rule keeps only definitions, a list of routine actions that NEPA does not cover, categorical exclusions from environmental review and an emergency provision in the Code of Federal Regulations. The rest of USPS's procedures move to a standard operating procedures handbook that the rule calls nonbinding guidance. It also adds two categorical exclusions: one for buying or converting vehicles that are at least as fuel efficient and clean as the ones they replace, and one for processing network changes meant to improve performance. USPS says the rewrite follows the repeal of the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA regulations, amendments Congress made to NEPA in 2023 and 2025, and the Supreme Court's 2025 decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County. It extended the comment period to November 9. On November 9, attorneys general for 18 states and the District of Columbia, joined by Harris County, Texas, and the City of New York, filed comments calling the rule unlawful and asking USPS to withdraw it. They say it curtails environmental review and public participation and object to six of the rule's categorical exclusions as vague or overbroad.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Comments of the attorneys general of California, New York and other states opposing the Postal Service's NEPA interim final rule (opens in a new tab)33-page comment letter dated November 9, 2026, sent to Postal Service environmental counsel Thomas Shepherd

About this source

The coalition's comments asking the Postal Service to withdraw the rule. They argue it curtails environmental review and public participation contrary to NEPA, and object to six categorical exclusions, including the new exclusion for vehicle procurement and fuel conversion.

Before the quotation

The letter says the states have a strong interest in NEPA compliance and public participation to protect their residents, property and natural resources, and in federal agencies consulting state agencies with relevant expertise.

After the quotation

The letter goes on to object to six of the rule's categorical exclusions, and says that using the new vehicle exclusion to change USPS's commitment to a 62 percent electric delivery fleet without a new environmental impact statement would be inappropriate.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The attorneys general call the rule unlawful, say it harms their states and ask USPS to withdraw it entirely, so we labeled it condemns.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Rob Bonta, Bonta and other attorneys general call the Postal Service's NEPA rule unlawful and ask USPS to withdraw itDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Bonta and other attorneys general call the Postal Service's NEPA rule unlawful and ask USPS to withdraw it
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/9005-in-comments-filed-with-usps-the-coalition-says

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Bonta and other attorneys general call the Postal Service's NEPA rule unlawful and ask USPS to withdraw it". First published: 2026-11-15. Last updated: 2026-11-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/9005-in-comments-filed-with-usps-the-coalition-says