Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the rule continues attacks on food assistance
Center on Budget and Policy PrioritiesTy Jones Cox, vice president for food assistance, in a statement quoted by CBS News
Ty Jones Cox of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says that instead of listening to public sentiment on affordability after the election, the administration is continuing its attacks on food assistance and the families who rely on it.
Responding to
Broad-based categorical eligibility lets households with income and assets far above federal limits receive SNAP, a benefit meant for the neediest, and ending it would close a long-standing loophole.
“Instead of listening to the public sentiment on affordability following the election, the administration is continuing its attacks on vital food assistance and the families who need help to put food on the table”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
USDA proposes ending SNAP's broad-based categorical eligibility and estimates 6.3 million people would lose benefits; the department calls the policy a loophole, and Democrats and anti-hunger groups oppose the rule
On November 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Agriculture published a proposed rule that would end broad-based categorical eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Under current rules, states may treat a household as eligible for SNAP when it receives any benefit or service funded by Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), including non-cash help such as child care or job training. The proposal would limit that automatic eligibility to households that receive TANF assistance as federal rules define it. The department's impact analysis estimates that 3.2 million households with 6.3 million people would no longer receive SNAP in fiscal 2029, the first year of full effect, because their income or resources exceed federal limits. It estimates federal SNAP benefit spending would fall by about $44.6 billion over five years, and that about 1.78 million children would lose automatic eligibility for free school meals, though it says about 97 percent of them would still qualify for free or reduced-price meals by applying separately. Comments are due December 10, 2026. A USDA spokesperson said the policy has bloated the welfare rolls and called closing the loophole long overdue, and a White House spokeswoman said the administration will keep stopping fraud in safety-net programs. Rep. Angie Craig, the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, called the rule heartless and cruel, and other Democrats and anti-hunger groups said it would increase hunger.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
CBS MoneyWatch report on the proposed rule, with emailed statements from a USDA spokesperson and White House spokeswoman Allison Schuster, and comments from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Rep. Angie Craig and the Food Research and Action Center.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
CBS News reports that critics said cutting so many Americans from SNAP would greatly increase food insecurity.
After the quotation
According to the center, the rule would end SNAP for people with gross household income just above 130 percent of the poverty line, about $35,500 a year for a family of three.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Jones Cox calls the proposed rule a continuation of the administration's attacks on food assistance, which condemns the rule.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseDon Beyer says Trump wants to strip SNAP access from 6.3 million more people
“More than 5 million Americans have lost their SNAP benefits under Donald Trump and Republicans' Big Ugly Bill. Now, Trump wants to strip access from 6.3 million more.”Read statement
Elizabeth Warren calls the SNAP eligibility proposal beyond cruel
“This is beyond cruel. 5.5 million Americans have already lost SNAP since Trump took office. Now, he wants to rip food assistance away from 6 MILLION more who are already struggling to get by because of his sky high gas prices and chaotic tariffs. Congress needs to stop this.”Read statement
John Fetterman agrees with Angie Craig that the SNAP rule is heartless and cruel
“Nearly 300,000 Pennsylvanians would be kicked off SNAP. Going after hungry families isn’t a solution. I agree with @RepAngieCraig, it’s heartless and cruel.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the rule continues attacks on food assistance
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/8900-ty-jones-cox-of-the-center-on-budget
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the rule continues attacks on food assistance". First published: 2026-11-14. Last updated: 2026-11-14. https://disputeindex.com/events/8900-ty-jones-cox-of-the-center-on-budget