Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the rule continues attacks on food assistance

Center on Budget and Policy PrioritiesTy Jones Cox, vice president for food assistance, in a statement quoted by CBS News

Condemned

Ty Jones Cox of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says that instead of listening to public sentiment on affordability after the election, the administration is continuing its attacks on food assistance and the families who rely on it.

Responding to

Broad-based categorical eligibility lets households with income and assets far above federal limits receive SNAP, a benefit meant for the neediest, and ending it would close a long-standing loophole.

“Instead of listening to the public sentiment on affordability following the election, the administration is continuing its attacks on vital food assistance and the families who need help to put food on the table”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)CBS News: New SNAP proposal would increase food insecurity for millions of Americans, critics say · CBS NewsArticle text

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Where this statement fits

USDA proposes ending SNAP's broad-based categorical eligibility and estimates 6.3 million people would lose benefits; the department calls the policy a loophole, and Democrats and anti-hunger groups oppose the rule

On November 10, 2026, the U.S. Department of Agriculture published a proposed rule that would end broad-based categorical eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Under current rules, states may treat a household as eligible for SNAP when it receives any benefit or service funded by Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), including non-cash help such as child care or job training. The proposal would limit that automatic eligibility to households that receive TANF assistance as federal rules define it. The department's impact analysis estimates that 3.2 million households with 6.3 million people would no longer receive SNAP in fiscal 2029, the first year of full effect, because their income or resources exceed federal limits. It estimates federal SNAP benefit spending would fall by about $44.6 billion over five years, and that about 1.78 million children would lose automatic eligibility for free school meals, though it says about 97 percent of them would still qualify for free or reduced-price meals by applying separately. Comments are due December 10, 2026. A USDA spokesperson said the policy has bloated the welfare rolls and called closing the loophole long overdue, and a White House spokeswoman said the administration will keep stopping fraud in safety-net programs. Rep. Angie Craig, the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, called the rule heartless and cruel, and other Democrats and anti-hunger groups said it would increase hunger.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

CBS News: New SNAP proposal would increase food insecurity for millions of Americans, critics say (opens in a new tab) · CBS NewsArticle text

About this source

CBS MoneyWatch report on the proposed rule, with emailed statements from a USDA spokesperson and White House spokeswoman Allison Schuster, and comments from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Rep. Angie Craig and the Food Research and Action Center.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

CBS News reports that critics said cutting so many Americans from SNAP would greatly increase food insecurity.

After the quotation

According to the center, the rule would end SNAP for people with gross household income just above 130 percent of the poverty line, about $35,500 a year for a family of three.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Jones Cox calls the proposed rule a continuation of the administration's attacks on food assistance, which condemns the rule.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the rule continues attacks on food assistanceDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the rule continues attacks on food assistance
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8900-ty-jones-cox-of-the-center-on-budget

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Center on Budget and Policy Priorities says the rule continues attacks on food assistance". First published: 2026-11-14. Last updated: 2026-11-14. https://disputeindex.com/events/8900-ty-jones-cox-of-the-center-on-budget