Szpunar makes infringement depend on the access and output

Maciej SzpunarFirst Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Mixed or conditional

Szpunar proposes a conditional infringement test for news retrieval and outputs, then suggests the submitted example may not meet it, subject to the national court's findings.

“Subject to that court’s findings, it would appear that that is not the case.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Like Company v. Google IrelandCase C-250/25; points 14-21, 36-56, 170-171, 187-209, 218-222 and 224-240

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)CJEU press release on the Like Company opinionPress release No. 155/26, pages 1-3

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Google's name on the glass facade of its headquarters in Mountain View, California.
Credit: Asoundd / CC BY-SA 4.0

Where this statement fits

Like Company alleges Gemini infringed its press publisher rights; Google disputes the claim

Like Company alleges that Google's Gemini reused its news publications without permission. Google contests the claim. Advocate General Maciej Szpunar proposes circumstances in which real-time retrieval and outputs can infringe, while suggesting the submitted example may not meet the test. His opinion does not bind the EU court.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Like Company v. Google Ireland (opens in a new tab)Case C-250/25; points 14-21, 36-56, 170-171, 187-209, 218-222 and 224-240

About this source

Szpunar records the parties' arguments and proposes a legal test for retrieval and reuse of press publications. The opinion is nonbinding and separates those questions from hypothetical training claims.

Official statement

CJEU press release on the Like Company opinion (opens in a new tab)Press release No. 155/26, pages 1-3

About this source

The court explains the advocate general's proposed approach and states that his opinion does not bind the Court of Justice.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

After setting out his proposed conditions, he says the Hungarian referring court must decide whether they are met in the main proceedings.

After the quotation

His opinion is advisory. The Court of Justice is not bound by it, and the national court retains the factual assessment.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

For Gemini's reuse, Szpunar identifies circumstances that can infringe but makes liability depend on legal and factual conditions and doubts the submitted example meets them.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Maciej Szpunar, Szpunar makes infringement depend on the access and outputDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Szpunar makes infringement depend on the access and output
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8295-szpunar-proposes-a-conditional-infringement-test-for-news

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Szpunar makes infringement depend on the access and output". First published: 2026-11-06. Last updated: 2026-11-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/8295-szpunar-proposes-a-conditional-infringement-test-for-news