Project On Government Oversight, in a statement by interim executive director Isabel Munilla, says stacking Project Meridian with industry leaders will skew national security policy
Project On Government OversightIsabel Munilla, interim executive director of the Project On Government Oversight, a plaintiff, in the plaintiffs' joint announcement
Munilla says filling Project Meridian with industry leaders will push national security policy further toward corporate priorities and away from the public interest.
Responding to
Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey and other Project Meridian members have substantial financial interests in the outcome of the study's recommendations.
“Stacking Project Meridian with industry leaders will further skew national security policy toward corporate priorities, and away from the public interest.”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Watchdog groups sue the Pentagon over Project Meridian, saying the Musk and Luckey 'Future of Warfare' panel breaks federal advisory committee law
CREW, Public Citizen and POGO say Project Meridian, the Pentagon study co-led by Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey and Newt Gingrich, is an advisory committee operating in secret without a charter or balanced membership. The Defense Department says MITRE applies conflict-of-interest safeguards.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
The plaintiffs' joint announcement of the lawsuit, posted on the Public Citizen website, with statements from CREW president Donald K. Sherman, Public Citizen co-president Robert Weissman and POGO interim executive director Isabel Munilla.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Munilla says the federal government should not outsource its vision on the future of warfare to a panel dominated by individuals who stand to profit from it, and that the weapons industry has long benefited from outsized influence over the Pentagon.
After the quotation
She adds that the public cannot afford more wasteful defense spending and that the committee must follow the law and add independent public interest representatives.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is the Defense Department's creation and operation of Project Meridian with Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey and Newt Gingrich at its head, which the plaintiffs say violates federal advisory committee law and critics say carries conflicts of interest. Munilla criticizes the panel's makeup as dominated by people who stand to profit and says it will skew policy toward corporate priorities.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- United States Department of Defense
More from this case
Read the full casePublic Citizen, in a statement by co-president Robert Weissman, says the law requires balance to stop insiders like Musk and Luckey from writing policy
Public Citizen
“That would simultaneously make the world more dangerous and starve funding for domestic and human needs. The law demands balance on advisory committees, precisely to prevent connected insiders like Musk and Luckey from writing policy at the expense of the public.”Read statement
CREW president Donald K. Sherman says Project Meridian must either comply with the Federal Advisory Committee Act or stop operating
“The Federal Advisory Committee Act sets clear requirements about transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest, and Project Meridian must either comply or stop operating.”Read statement
Richard Painter tells NPR that Musk wants to make money selling AI to the Defense Department and that whatever he proposes is not a neutral public service
“So if we go into it understanding that [Musk], like all the other contractors, he wants to make a lot of money selling AI to the Defense Department. Whatever he proposes, but it's not like he's doing it as a neutral public service.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Project On Government Oversight, in a statement by interim executive director Isabel Munilla, says stacking Project Meridian with industry leaders will skew national security policy
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/7834-munilla-says-filling-project-meridian-with-industry-leaders
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Project On Government Oversight, in a statement by interim executive director Isabel Munilla, says stacking Project Meridian with industry leaders will skew national security policy". First published: 2026-11-03. Last updated: 2026-11-03. https://disputeindex.com/events/7834-munilla-says-filling-project-meridian-with-industry-leaders