ID.me claims stronger verification performance in TreasuryDirect dispute.

ID.meCompany spokesperson in an emailed response to FedScoop

Defended or excused

In the TreasuryDirect dispute, ID.me says it outperforms alternatives on service, access and fraud prevention.

“has consistently outperformed alternatives in customer service, ease of use, expanding access, protecting taxpayer data, and fighting fraud”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Treasury and ID.me respond to senators' concernsTreasury and ID.me emailed responses reported by Matt Bracken

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The columned entrance of the U.S. Treasury Building in Washington, D.C.
Credit: Carol M. Highsmith / Library of Congress (public domain)

Where this statement fits

Wyden and Warren oppose mandatory ID.me at TreasuryDirect; Treasury defends the change.

TreasuryDirect made ID.me its only online sign-in method on October 28, 2026. Senators Ron Wyden and Elizabeth Warren asked Treasury to delay the requirement until after the 2027 tax-filing deadline and explain why Treasury and the IRS use ID.me instead of government-run Login.gov. They cited privacy, biometric-data and access concerns, particularly for older investors. A Treasury official told FedScoop that ID.me will safeguard users' personal and financial information against unauthorized access and identity theft. ID.me says it outperforms alternatives and that biometric data it collects is never sold or shared. Treasury's undated FAQ says investors' funds remain safe despite restrictions on online access.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

Treasury and ID.me respond to senators' concerns (opens in a new tab)Treasury and ID.me emailed responses reported by Matt Bracken

About this source

FedScoop received the institutional responses. The company's comparative performance claims are its own assertions.

Before the quotation

FedScoop's report, dated October 29, includes an emailed statement from an ID.me spokesperson.

After the quotation

The spokesperson also limits the data it says it shares with TreasuryDirect and denies selling or sharing biometric data.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The company defends the choice of its service on usability, access, security and fraud prevention.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: ID.me, ID.me claims stronger verification performance in TreasuryDirect dispute.Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
ID.me claims stronger verification performance in TreasuryDirect dispute.
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7811-in-the-treasurydirect-dispute-id-me-says-it

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "ID.me claims stronger verification performance in TreasuryDirect dispute.". First published: 2026-11-03. Last updated: 2026-11-03. https://disputeindex.com/events/7811-in-the-treasurydirect-dispute-id-me-says-it