X challenges Ofcom's notice as disproportionate

X Internet Unlimited CompanyX Internet Unlimited Company litigation position documented in the October 30 judgment

Condemned

X argues that the compliance burden is disproportionate. It also raises a property-rights challenge.

“Action: Challenged Ofcom's notice as disproportionate and as interference with its property rights, citing millions of pounds in costs and months of specialist work.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)R (Meta, X and TikTok) v. Ofcom: judgment[2026] EWHC 2779 (Admin), paragraphs 68-73, 137-169

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Riverside House, the building housing Ofcom offices, on the south bank of the Thames in London.
Credit: Jim Linwood / Wikimedia Commons

Where this statement fits

Meta, X and TikTok challenge Ofcom information demands; the regulator defends them

Meta, X and TikTok challenged Ofcom's power to demand information about their services and the burden of complying. Ofcom defended the notices as lawful and proportionate. The High Court refused permission on most grounds and dismissed the proportionality and human-rights grounds on their merits on October 30.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

R (Meta, X and TikTok) v. Ofcom: judgment (opens in a new tab)[2026] EWHC 2779 (Admin), paragraphs 68-73, 137-169

About this source

The High Court dismisses challenges to Ofcom's information notices and addresses statutory purpose and proportionality.

Before the quotation

The judgment records X's cost and staffing evidence at paragraph 143.

After the quotation

The court grants permission on the proportionality and human-rights grounds but dismisses them on their merits.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

X opposes the information notice that is under scrutiny in the case.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: X Internet Unlimited Company, X challenges Ofcom's notice as disproportionateDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
X challenges Ofcom's notice as disproportionate
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7696-x-argues-that-the-compliance-burden-is-disproportionate

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "X challenges Ofcom's notice as disproportionate". First published: 2026-11-02. Last updated: 2026-11-02. https://disputeindex.com/events/7696-x-argues-that-the-compliance-burden-is-disproportionate