Shellenberger and Gutentag portray CODA's cancellation as censorship

Michael ShellenbergerPublic founder, coauthor with Alex Gutentag

Condemned

Shellenberger and Gutentag present CODA's cancellation and calls to halt the Sundial as examples of ideological censorship. They portray the student essay as a challenge to a prevailing narrative. Their claim that the writers were right is an opinion, not a determination of the Cornell allegations.

“It's that it relentlessly tries to silence those who get it right.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Shellenberger and Gutentag portray CODA's cancellation as censorshipJoint article; paragraphs discussing Columbia

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Low Memorial Library and its steps on Columbia University's campus.
Credit: Magpieturtle

Where this statement fits

Columbia's CODA cancels a press-freedom panel after Sundial's Cornell 7 essay; critics object

Columbia Open Discourse Alliance canceled a press-freedom panel after the Sundial published its Cornell 7 essay. CODA cited survivors' participation and safety. Critics challenged the cancellation; faculty advisers gave qualified assessments of that decision.

Read the full case

Source and context

Analysis

Shellenberger and Gutentag portray CODA's cancellation as censorship (opens in a new tab)Joint article; paragraphs discussing Columbia

About this source

The jointly authored article promotes the authors' forthcoming book. Its claims about the underlying Cornell allegations are their interpretation.

Before the quotation

The jointly authored article makes a broader argument about the political left and promotes their forthcoming book.

After the quotation

They cite the petition against the Sundial and CODA's canceled panel as examples.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The coauthors condemn the cancellation as censorship.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Michael Shellenberger, Shellenberger and Gutentag portray CODA's cancellation as censorshipDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Shellenberger and Gutentag portray CODA's cancellation as censorship
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7418-shellenberger-and-gutentag-present-coda-s-cancellation-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Shellenberger and Gutentag portray CODA's cancellation as censorship". First published: 2026-10-31. Last updated: 2026-10-31. https://disputeindex.com/events/7418-shellenberger-and-gutentag-present-coda-s-cancellation-and