Schor supports the 32-hour workweek proposal

Juliet SchorBoston College sociologist, in March 14, 2024 Senate testimony

Schor cites shorter-week trials and argues that reducing hours can improve well-being and hourly productivity.

“it is now time for a 32 hour week.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Senate HELP hearing on the 32-hour workweek: official transcriptMarch 14, 2024 hearing; Cassidy opening statement and Schor testimony
Bernie Sanders speaking into a microphone with U.S. and Arizona flags behind him.
Credit: Gage Skidmore / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Where this statement fits

Should Congress Enact Bernie Sanders’s 32-Hour Workweek Bill?

On September 8, 2026, Rep. Mark Takano introduced H.R. 10323, the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act; Sen. Bernie Sanders introduced the Senate companion, S. 5384, on September 14. The bills would phase the federal weekly overtime threshold for covered nonexempt workers from 40 to 32 hours and add daily premium-pay thresholds; they would not set a universal cap on work hours. Supporters urge Congress to enact them as a way to share productivity gains, while opponents predict harm to jobs, benefits, and prices. The dispute is whether Congress should enact the paired proposals.

Read the full case

Case updates

Where do the 32-hour workweek bills go from here?

You'll hear from us if the House or Senate bill moves in committee, or if Sanders, Takano, the White House or other critics make new arguments.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Senate HELP hearing on the 32-hour workweek: official transcript (opens in a new tab)March 14, 2024 hearing; Cassidy opening statement and Schor testimony

About this source

The official hearing transcript records Cassidy opposing a federal mandate and Schor supporting the legislation.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

She discusses productivity gains and unchanged standard hours.

After the quotation

She concludes her oral statement.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is a 32-hour workweek. Schor expressly supports it.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

UE confirms it endorses the 32-hour workweek bill

United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America

“I can confirm that we did, indeed, endorse the bill. ... The Sanders bill is in line with our resolution, "A Just Economy for All" ... which "Reaffirms ... our goal of reducing the work week" and "Calls upon the labor movement to pursue a shorter work week with no loss in pay."”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Juliet Schor, Schor supports the 32-hour workweek proposalDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Schor supports the 32-hour workweek proposal
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7179-schor-cites-shorter-week-trials-and-argues-that

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Schor supports the 32-hour workweek proposal". First published: 2026-10-29. Last updated: 2026-10-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/7179-schor-cites-shorter-week-trials-and-argues-that