Kash Patel declines to pledge the FBI will not interfere in the elections

Kash PatelFBI Director

Explicitly stayed out

Kash Patel declined to give Sen. Peter Welch a direct pledge against FBI election interference, calling the request "a charade of lies."

“When did you hear that? It’s just another lie... I have pledged unequivocally that I will not participate in your charade of lies.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Kash Patel Won’t Rule Out Sending Armed Federal Agents to the Polls

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Patel won’t say whether FBI agents will be at the polls this fall

Other statements by Kash Patel in this case

Every statement by Kash Patel
Official FBI portrait of Director Kash Patel
Credit: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Where this statement fits

Patel questioned on FBI presence at Michigan polling places after John James claim

Michigan gubernatorial candidate John James said Kash Patel privately told him the FBI would have a presence in Michigan before the 2026 midterm elections. At a September 15, 2026 Senate hearing, Sen. Peter Welch asked Patel whether that was true. Patel did not directly confirm or deny it, instead describing standing FBI "election crimes community coordinators" in each field office, and separately declined to pledge that the FBI would not interfere with the elections when pressed further.

Read the full case

Case updates

FBI agents near Michigan polls: will Patel say more?

Get an email if Patel, the Justice Department or John James says more about FBI plans near polling places, or if Blanche answers Krishnamoorthi's letter.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Reporting

Kash Patel Won’t Rule Out Sending Armed Federal Agents to the Polls (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Fullest quoted transcript of the "just another lie" / "charade of lies" back-and-forth between Welch and Patel, corroborated by embedded video clips.

Reporting

Patel won’t say whether FBI agents will be at the polls this fall (opens in a new tab)

About this source

The fullest secondary account of the Welch–Patel exchange, quoting Welch’s full question and Patel’s reply verbatim, plus the surrounding contentious back-and-forth.

Before the quotation

Welch, reacting to Patel’s coordinators answer, said "I thought you weren’t going to be sending people to the polls" and then asked Patel directly to pledge the FBI would not interfere with the November elections.

After the quotation

Sen. John Cornyn, who had taken over the gavel from Chairman Grassley, intervened to tell the two senators to "knock it off."

How this statement is classified

Explicitly stayed out

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

When Welch asked Patel to "pledge that you will not in any way interfere in the will of the American people when they go to the polls," Patel did not answer yes or no. Instead he called the question "just another lie" and said he had "pledged unequivocally that I will not participate in your charade of lies" — refusing to give the requested pledge rather than answering it.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Krishnamoorthi says Patel's ambiguity on agents at the polls is "difficult to reconcile with federal law"

Raja Krishnamoorthi

“This ambiguity is difficult to reconcile with federal law. Since 1948, 18 U.S.C. § 592 has made it a felony for any officer "in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States" to order, bring, or keep "armed men" at any place where a general election is held, absent the need to repel armed enemies of the United States. The penalty includes up to five years' imprisonment and disqualification from federal office. The Department's own manual on the Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses has long construed that provision to reach armed federal agents, not merely military personnel. Director Patel's stated uncertainty about whether the Bureau may lawfully send agents to the polls is therefore not a close legal question. It is a question the Department answered decades ago, in its own published guidance.”
Read statement

Amy Klobuchar says federal law and Justice Department guidance bar agents from polling places

Amy Klobuchar

“Are you aware of the Justice Department’s longstanding guidance that states that FBI agents cannot conduct investigations inside polling places on election day and that federal prosecutors have no authority to send FBI special agents or deploy US marshals to polling places?” … “And so will you commit to following clear federal law and DOJ policy and not deploy federal agents to polling places?”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Kash Patel, Kash Patel declines to pledge the FBI will not interfere in the electionsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kash Patel declines to pledge the FBI will not interfere in the elections
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/714-kash-patel-declined-to-give-sen-peter-welch

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kash Patel declines to pledge the FBI will not interfere in the elections". First published: 2026-09-16. Last updated: 2026-09-16. https://disputeindex.com/events/714-kash-patel-declined-to-give-sen-peter-welch