Jaffer calls the restrictions an attack on democratic foundations
Jameel JafferKnight Institute executive director and counsel in the case
Jaffer argues that an informed public requires an independent press and criticizes the restrictions on White House reporters.
“The president’s attack on the independence of the White House press corps should be understood in that light. It’s an attack on the foundations of our democracy.”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Should President Trump bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over their coverage?
On Friday, September 18, 2026, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that, "effective immediately, I am banning" CNN, MS NOW and Politico "from the White House as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS!" About an hour later, in the Oval Office, he said no particular story prompted the decision, that he does not want the outlets "in my office," and that "somebody has a right to keep them away" if outlets write false stories. The three outlets and press-freedom groups oppose the exclusion, citing constitutional protection for the press, and the White House Correspondents' Association said it "stands in defense of our colleagues at CNN, MSNOW, and POLITICO." On Saturday, September 19, MS NOW, CNN and Politico said their White House reporters were refused entry and had press passes confiscated; the White House referred questions to Trump's earlier remarks. The dispute is over whether President Trump should exclude named news organizations from White House access over what they report.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Counsel announces Roth v. Trump and explains its requested relief and differences from the outlets' earlier lawsuit.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Jaffer begins by saying the First Amendment reflects a recognition that democracy requires an informed public, and that an informed public requires an independent press.
After the quotation
The announcement then lists the six plaintiffs: Kenneth Roth, Daniel Froomkin, Beverly Gage, Peter Schmidt-Nowara, Benjamin Wittes and Ethan Young.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The conduct at issue is excluding White House journalists because of their coverage. This statement expressly criticizes those restrictions.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseWhite House says no journalist has a right to Oval Office or Air Force One access
The White House
“No person and no journalist has a constitutional right to access to the President's Oval Office, Air Force One, or other sensitive and private facilities.”Read statement
Schiff says White House press exclusions also harm the public
“When a reporter is denied access to the White House, it isn't just that news organization that suffers. The American people rely on a free press to know what their government is up to, and whether it is acting wisely and lawfully.”Read statement
Fallow says the White House cannot punish critical coverage
“The White House cannot decide what information Americans receive by punishing critical reporting”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Jaffer calls the restrictions an attack on democratic foundations
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6908-jaffer-argues-that-an-informed-public-requires-an
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Jaffer calls the restrictions an attack on democratic foundations". First published: 2026-10-27. Last updated: 2026-10-27. https://disputeindex.com/events/6908-jaffer-argues-that-an-informed-public-requires-an