Thakker questions the inference drawn from Slok's charts

Yash ThakkerFounder and writer at explainx.ai

Thakker does not dispute Slok's charts but argues that flat aggregate figures cannot isolate AI's effects. He says that caution also applies to claims that AI caused the largest tech companies' gains, and reads Slok's zero-payoff claim as an aggregate financial claim.

“flat S&P 493 numbers do not prove AI has no effect”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)No AI payoff outside tech? Apollo Slok note, checkedAggregate financial measures, the S&P 493 comparison and causal inference
Economist Brad DeLong seated in his office in front of bookshelves.
Credit: Brad DeLong

Where this statement fits

Slok says AI has no payoff outside tech; DeLong challenges his measure

Torsten Slok says AI has delivered no financial payoff outside tech, citing revenue, margins and productivity measures. Brad DeLong accepts the flat corporate series but argues that user benefits and new firms may matter more. He also questions whether those benefits justify current valuations.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

No AI payoff outside tech? Apollo Slok note, checked (opens in a new tab)Aggregate financial measures, the S&P 493 comparison and causal inference

About this source

Thakker discusses the limits of using aggregate revenue and margin charts to isolate AI's financial effects. He applies the same causal caution to claims about gains at the largest technology companies.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Thakker discusses Slok's charts comparing the Magnificent Seven with the S&P 493.

After the quotation

He applies the same causal caution to claims that AI produced the largest technology companies gains.

How this statement is classified

Challenged the characterization

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Thakker challenges the inference that aggregate S&P493 figures isolate AI's financial contribution, while leaving the charted observations undisputed.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Yash Thakker, Thakker questions the inference drawn from Slok's chartsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Thakker questions the inference drawn from Slok's charts
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6828-thakker-does-not-dispute-slok-s-charts-but

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Thakker questions the inference drawn from Slok's charts". First published: 2026-10-26. Last updated: 2026-10-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/6828-thakker-does-not-dispute-slok-s-charts-but